Computer history

The history of computing

CloudStuff Versus Stuff in the Cloud

logo_cloudcampThis world of cloud computing sure can seem cloudy. Last night at CloudCamp Columbus, I led a session outlining the incredible differences between the diverse offerings all called cloud storage. How can companies like Amazon, Nirvanix, Rackspace, EMC, and the rest use the same name for such vastly different products? Continue Reading »

Computer history
Enterprise storage
Personal
Virtual Storage

Comments

Permalink

CloudStuff Versus Stuff in the CloudTweet & Track

Seagate Surpasses 500 GB In 2.5 Inches

Seagate LogoThe race to ship a 500 GB mobile hard disk drive unit was heated last year. Hitachi was first to announce a fat 12.5 mm drive in January, but Samsung and Western Digital fought a pitched battle through the second half of the year to produce serious volume in a the slim 9.5 mm 2-platter form factor. 320 GB and 500 GB became common in the first half of 2009, with vendors adding a baby-step 400 GB size as well.

Until this month, all four major disk vendors have remained silent on the step past the half-terabyte barrier, however. Certainly any could have slapped together a 640 GB, 750 GB, or even 1 TB 4-platter semi-mobile disk drive using existing technology, as Hitachi did last year, but no such announcement came. But the break just came: Seagate has quietly added a 640 GB model to their 2.5 inch FreeAgent Go portable disk drive line. There was no press release, but this is a major step forward. Continue Reading »

Computer history
Terabyte home

Comments

Permalink

Seagate Surpasses 500 GB In 2.5 InchesTweet & Track

Google Is Heading For A Cliff; What Will They Do?

Google is the most important company to the Internet. Hyberbole? I think not! Without Google, the Internet that we all know and love would be a very different place, as would the business of IT. Along with Microsoft and the supporting community around LAMP, Google is the very foundation of modern computing. But the foundation of Google itself, its ability to rank Internet content and present relevant information to its users, is at risk. What will they do to fix it?

Continue Reading »

Computer history
Personal

Comments

Permalink

Google Is Heading For A Cliff; What Will They Do?Tweet & Track

PowerPath To The Virtual People

Hiding in the shadow of the huge VMware vSphere 4 announcement was a very interesting introduction by EMC: PowerPath/VE. As I mentioned in my post on storage changes in vSphere 4, PowerPath/VE plugs into the new pluggable storage architecture (PSA) found in vSphere 4 versions of ESX and takes over the decision-making and heavy-lifting tasks related to communicating with storage systems. Continue Reading »

Computer history
Enterprise storage
Gestalt IT
Virtual Storage

Comments

Permalink

PowerPath To The Virtual PeopleTweet & Track

Ten-Year Trend: Mobility

IT infrastructure is following consumer technology out of the glass house and into the wide world

IT infrastructure is following consumer technology out of the data center glass house and into the wide world


Dave Hitz over at NetApp poses a very interesting question: What is the ten-year trend in information technology that we are currently building to? He supplies these historical examples:

  • 1982-1992: A computer on every (business) desk
  • 1990s: Networking all those computers

He then goes on to suggest three ten-year trends that we might currently be living through:

  1. Cloud/Outsourced Computing
  2. Server Virtualization
  3. Flash Memory

Although I agree on the importance of these three to enterprise IT, I don’t think they’ll be seen as the megatrends of this decade in hindsight. I suggest that, more than anything, we are witnessing a wholesale shift from information tied to place/device to information mobility. Cloud computing, server virtualization, and even flash memory are all contributors to this massive trend, along with the user-side trends of the post-PDA mobile phone, 3G data, social web services, and connected home.

Continue Reading »

Apple
Computer history
Enterprise storage
Everything
Personal
Terabyte home
Virtual Storage

Comments

Permalink

Ten-Year Trend: MobilityTweet & Track

Storage Utilization Remains at 2001 Levels: Low!

I’ve been talking about storage capacity utilization for my entire career, but the storage industry doesn’t seem to be getting anywhere. Every year or so, a new study is performed showing that half of storage capacity in the data center is unused. And every time there is a predictable (and poorly thought through) “networked storage is a waste of time” response.

The good news is that this is no longer a technical problem: Modern virtualized and networked servers ought to have decent utilization of storage capacity, and technology is improving all the time. Consider the compounded impact of modern technology on storage capacity utilization:

  • Shared storage (SAN and NAS) allows different servers to share a common pool of storage, reducing the likelihood that excess capacity will be stranded in isolated “puddles”. Pervasive use of NAS technology, and the rise of simple and inexpensive iSCSI SANs, means that every system in the modern data center can use shared storage.
  • Organizational and architectural optimization allows storage to be provisioned from a common pool rather than building “stovepipe systems” with their own resources. Quicker provisioning also helps reduce over-provisioning.
  • Network connectivity allows servers to share resources, including storage, on a peer-to-peer or client-server basis, ultimately resulting in things like cloud computing.
  • Managed and utility services reduce the impact of low utilization, potentially focusing on efficiency or perhaps passing the buck to a service provider.
  • Thin provisioning might help certain systems to keep less storage in reserve.

So why don’t things get better? It’s hard to be sure why people don’t use these pervasive tools to improve storage utilization, but I do have some ideas… Continue Reading »

Computer history
Enterprise storage
Gestalt IT
Virtual Storage

Comments

Permalink

Storage Utilization Remains at 2001 Levels: Low!Tweet & Track

AncientFS Opens Archaic Filesystems To Mac OS X

Just a quick note: Google’s Amit Singh recently introduced a new addition to the MacFUSE user-space filesystem software for OS X: AncientFS allows the Mac to read a host of archaic file systems and data container formats, from DECtape to Dump to the various flavors of the standard UNIX file system.

This ought to be useful for those of us who have standardized our desktops on OS X yet still maintain a variety of old data storage systems and archives.

Apple
Computer history

Comments

Permalink

AncientFS Opens Archaic Filesystems To Mac OS XTweet & Track

Remembering Storage Magazine

Seven years' proof of excellence

Storage magazine: seven years' proof of excellence

All things must pass, but it is with a heavy heart that I note that TechTarget’s excellent Storage magazine has shipped its last issue. No official word has been posted by the company, but it is now widely reported. All print publications are feeling squeezed by a move to online readership which robs print of advertising revenue with its quicker turnaround and lower cost. Like its ancestor, Byte, and PC Magazine, Storage will continue online at searchstorage.com as well as through a controlled-circulation PDF newsletter. I do not yet know which of the excellent staff (writers, illustrators, and editors) of Storage will remain with these online efforts.

Continue Reading »

Computer history
Enterprise storage
Personal
Virtual Storage

Comments

Permalink

Remembering Storage MagazineTweet & Track

Of Emulated Fibre Channel, Virtualization, And The Right Tool For The Job

EMC’s Chuck Hollis is one smart guy, and a very verbose blogger. As usual, he sparked a bit of a storm recently when comparing unified storage on EMC’s Celerra NX4 to NetApp’s multiprotocol FAS2020 filer. But it was one phrase in particular that got the attention of Alex McDonald and Kostadis Russos of NetApp, Martin/Storagebod, and Tony Asaro: “just because a vendor says they can emulate FC SAN behavior doesn’t mean it’s a real FC SAN.”

What was he getting at? Read the comments in Chuck’s post and you’ll understand his implication: Chuck suggests that NetApp “emulates” Fibre Channel in their FAS/OnTap devices on top of the WAFL “file system”, while EMC’s AX storage (behind the NX4) uses “real” Fibre Channel, so it’s better. He goes on to say that EMC is doing a brisk business replacing misfit NetApp FC arrays with real FC kit from EMC. But, as is so often the case, the truth is a little more complex than this: All enterprise storage arrays “emulate” Fibre Channel drives to one extent or another, and using the wrong tool for the job will always lead to trouble.

Continue Reading »

Computer history
Enterprise storage
Gestalt IT
Virtual Storage

Comments

Permalink

Of Emulated Fibre Channel, Virtualization, And The Right Tool For The JobTweet & Track

Top Ten Coolest Enterprise Storage Flops

This is the second entry in my Top-Ten in Storage series.

Not every innovative product can succeed in the market, and no matter how good some ideas seem, they can fail to make much of an impact. The truth is, people buy solutions, not technologies.

This list includes products so cool, so ahead of their time, that they just couldn’t fail. But they did.

Continue Reading »

Computer history
Enterprise storage

Comments

Permalink

Top Ten Coolest Enterprise Storage FlopsTweet & Track

Page 1 of 41234»
Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.