Interop Las Vegas Las Vegas, NV Apr 26
    Storage Networking World Orlando, FL Apr 12
    Tech Field Day Boston Boston, MA Apr 8
    • schnutz122
      For anyone considering running the ix2 or ix4 series in a production environment, DO NOT DO IT. The Iomega software (by their own admission) is very buggy through firmware version 2.1.25.229. In my case, the unit freezes & stops responding from 1m-15m after boot. Sure, the data is still there (no drive errors) and Iomega knows it's their problem. They'll send a replacement unit, but you'll be SOL when it comes to getting your latest data back.
    • schnutz122
      For anyone considering running the ix2 or ix4 series in a production environment, DO NOT DO IT. The Iomega software (by their own admission) is very buggy through firmware version 2.1.25.229. In my case, the unit freezes & stops responding from 1m-15m after boot. Sure, the data is still there (no drive errors) and Iomega knows it's their problem. They'll send a replacement unit, but you'll be SOL when it comes to getting your latest data back.
    • I think most of the buying public has never heard of most of these features, so the price remains hard for some to justify.
    • berginj
      Stephen, did you keep the box? I ended up picking up a 4tb as the price finally dropped low enough that I just couldn't say no.

      Interested to see if you have done anything major with it. My home lab is finally getting some real functionality. Worth the money in my book so far!
    • Bernd
      What is about the transfer rate over Ethernet?? I getting with the device here about between 15-20mb/s that is not even 6%. This device is soooooooooooooooooooooooo slow, my external HD was faster.
      I have 2 device and use one to backup the other one and at 700Gb it runs now more than 115hrs and is still at 60% transfered.
      If i only think that i would have the device fully loaded....... 1 week for a sync???
      And you give this nice review??? Shame, Shame......
    • I've been running performance tests on the ix4-200d review unit Iomega sent me and have not seen the best performance. I've never broken 30 MB/s using iSCSI, SMB, or QuickTransfer. Iomega insists this is too low and I should be getting better performance, and sent some suggestions. However I have not yet been able to try these out since I haven't been home much!
    • I have used the ix4 since August and have had no issues with it..the Gigabit ports are what drove me to the product...I can say that for NAS the product was outstanding and I thought the price was inline with the market if you are looking for something about quick plug and play USB...its great for a small business owner like us.
    • cgeerinckx
      The ix4-200d device indeed is Windows 2008 certified.
      But that doesn't mean it is usable as cluster shared storage in a hyper-v environment.

      It seems that ix-4-200d does not support scsi-3 persistent reservation (SPC-3). The hyper-v cluster validation fails on this item.

      Iomega support confirmed me that they doe not support scsi-3 persistent reservation.
    • Mo
      @cgeerinckx

      To bad. Thought it would be great for my homelab.
      Want to test hyper-v cluster.
      Wich NAS device is compatible with hyper-v (cluster)?????
    • [via lwn]

      I wouldn't buy anything from iomega -- they were losers with ZIP (which I owned too), its ancestors, and they were *ugly* a company to deal with as for a NAS software developer. There seems to have been left no techie inside by 2003, and managers would press then cancel on pretty solid Linux-based NAS to hit the developer company pretty bad.

      If you're a day-job software developer or manager, you know what it is when a company promises a breakthrough contract, then wears you down, then refuses to pay money for the job done and product delivered.
    • nigel
      UK pricing appears interesting. Its cheaper to buy a 2TB unit, toss out the 500GB drives and replace all of them with 1.5TB drives than it is to buy a 4TB unit. Why do manufacturers insist of shafting people so hard to get an upgraded version?
    • This is the same with US pricing. The 8 TB version is crazy expensive, and even the 4 TB one isn't competitive with a self-upgrade. BUT YOU CAN'T. I talked to the Iomega people at VMworld and they confirmed that there is no current upgrade path for these things. You're stuck with the drives you buy. Although you can unscrew the case (with thumbscrews!) and remove the drives, you cannot install larger drives at this point.
    • corradoc
      Stephen, are you sure you cannot upgrade disks? Is the underneath OS customized for each box and hardened to avoid user changing disks?
      To my knowledge, Iomega uses customized versions of BusyBox (a linux variant).
      I mean, I certainly have to go through a complete format (thus loosing content) but swapping disks with bigger ones shouldn't be impossible.
      Or, do you mean that, by doing this, you break warranty support?
    • Richard Sharpe
      To be clear, busybox is not a variant of Linux (either the kernel or a distro), it is a shell (replacement for bash) that is useful for embedded Linux because it cuts down on the space needed in flash for copies of all the commands supported by busybox (and duplicate copies of library routines or shared libraries etc).
    • Nick
      I'd like to see a comparison between Iomega's device and FreeNAS... As far as I can see, there's nothing Iomega can do that FreeNAS can't. Performance ought to be the differentiator...
    • You missed one of the biggest things for me. It replicates with a celerra!!!!
      http://storagezilla.typepad.com/storagezilla/20...
    • It replicates with ANYthing, including a Celerra. See point #2 under QuickTransfer.
    • The features look very good on this for home use. I'd even consider one myself. It'd likely be a good fit for SOHO as well. The SMB
      space and hosting VMware? Now that's, a stretch. Let's see... If I used the highest performance RAID config (RAID 10) and assumed a 1:1 random R/W ratio you max out at 120 IOPS with 4 drives. As in Chad's tweet, "point is valid - this will be for tiny, not performant-centric use cases.” I could see an individual or hobbyist playing with VMware on this, but running virtualized apps for my business? Don't think so.
    • John F - FYI, just so everyone knows, this is not the beginning (there have been earlier models), nor the end (there will be more - both smaller/cheaper, and larger/faster) of what iomega is doing down this front.

      I think it's criminal in VMware use cases to focus on capacity alone (man, a LOT of customer could run a lot in 8TB), and not think about the performance considerations.

      With thin provisioning, dedupe, 2TB drives all becoming mainstream - this is actually a bigger issue than people think - capacity is now RARELY the gating factor on storage - all all market segments.

      BUT - will be doing some testing when VMworld is done, and will post the results...
    • I think a SAS version, if it's in the cards, would go a long way to providing the performance level needed for small business to virtualize anything other than the occasional one-off tiny, non-performance centric application. I'd hate to see an otherwise good product get a bad rap from overly aggressive marketing.

      I'll be looking forward to seeing those performance numbers.


      John
    • I really don't think we will see a SAS (or eSATA) version of these arrays. They're not intended for maximum performance but for maximum capability and flexibility. block + file in a little desktop array is just awesome!
    • I don't know. It's a rapidly evolving market. Not talking bleeding edge 15K drives here. A 7.2K SAS drive still has enough umph to potentially get there. Right after my response to RIchard I did a quick search....

      1 TB SATA Barracuda ES.2 will get you about 40 random IOPS/Spindle @20 ms at $169 retail

      http://www.pcconnection.com/IPA/Shop/Product/De...

      1 TB SAS Barracuda ES.2 will get you about 90 random IOPS/Spindle @20ms at $219 retail.

      http://www.pcconnection.com/IPA/Shop/Product/De...

      The premium for the interface on the drive isn't proportional to performance improvement, and it isn't that much. We'll have to wait and see how it plays out.

      John
    • kirk frey
      Umm by my math its better:..
      40 IOPS for $169 or $4.23 per IOPS 90 IOPS for $219 or $2.43 per IOPS
    • Richard Sharpe
      Why do you think SAS will be so important for small businesses?

      Surely they all have multiple GbE ports in their servers these days, and the cabling infrastructure is in place. Further, 10GbE is bearing down on us.

      SAS on the other hand is a whole new ballgame. New cables, a SAS controller in the server and so forth. Do you really see small businesses undertaking that?
    • Hi Richard,

      In the low end of the market where you don't have large cache or sophisticated ASICs to improve performance, it comes down to IOPS/spindle. Talking about support for SAS drives in the device, not SAS interface to the server. With 4 SATA spindles, you'll smack into a disk IOPS bottleneck long before you would saturate the bandwidth of 1Ge.

      John
    • Richard Sharpe
      What do you consider a large cache?
    • Dave
      what is the power consumtion on one of these?
      (measured in real world conditions, not just quoted from their spec sheet)

      I would love one, but wonder what UK price will be ...

      Dave
    • Richard Sharpe
      Are there any performance numbers available?
    • Guest
      Iomega engineering reports performance in the 180mbps - 240mbps range using a popular benchmarking utility. I suggest looking at SmallNetBuilder.com to see if they have done testing yet. They compair with other popular NAS products on the market.
    • I'll try to bang on the thing when I get hands-on later this week. It can't be slower than the Drobo!
    • What about the noise ? Can we put it on a desk in an open space?

      What's the best way to connect a laptop ? Windows 7 include an ISCI connector, is it more efficient than SMB ?
    • Guest
      Benoit,

      I have an IX2-200d on my desk here in the office and don't even know it is running. Very quiet! Best way to connect a laptop is via a drive letter mapping via network unless you need block level access which I do not forsee from a laptop.

      Hope this information is helpful.
      Maurie
    • BrentO
      This is just jaw-dropping. Sold. I'm buying one the minute they come out. This solves so many problems for me, it's not even funny. Microsoft's Windows Home Server just lost all appeal for me.
    • If you'll be at VMworld, I've been told there will be a raffle and special discount on the ix4-200d!
    blog comments powered by Disqus
    Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.
    • Vimeo Videos