• My Posts
  • Toshiba Offers “Blade” SSDs (Like Apple’s MacBook Air)
  • My Stance on Embargoes
  • When To Embargo Blog News (And When Not To)
  • $50 Off The Excellent Sony NEX-3 Camera
• Enterprise IT
  • 90% Answers, and when they’re wrong
  • Perspectives on Quest Acquiring BakBone
  • Support FCoTR at SNW Spring
  • Announcing Tech Field Day 4: This Week in San Jose!
  • Jack be Nimble
  • Jase’s Place » Tech Field Day – San Jose – Update
  • The World Has Changed – Is Hardware Getting Softer?
  • People who like thin provisioning are not too stupid to administer storage
  • I/O Virtualization Blog » Will 100Gb Ethernet Interoperability Event Be Overshadowed By High Prices?
  • Commodity hardware always loses | RayOnStorage Blog
  • Apple Xserve EOL–Sad State Of Apple Server Situation
  • Apple, Xserves, and OS X Server
• Fun Stuff
  • A complete schematic of the Millennium Falcon
  • Self-Repair Manifesto
  • An overview of Office 2011 for Mac

Subscribe to my Google Reader feed or follow me on Twitter to see these in real-time.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2010. | Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, November 12, 2010
This post was categorized as Apple, Enterprise storage, Everything, Personal. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

The Snow Leopard kernel refuses to boot in 64-bit mode on most Macs. Should you care?

There is clearly a ton of interest in Mac OS X 10.6, Snow Leopard: My Snow Leopard features hardware compatibility chart had over 20,000 visitors in just three days! But one chart element is generating an inordinate amount of interest: Whether or not Snow Leopard can boot in 64-bit mode.

Snow Leopard is a solid but visually unremarkable update to Apple’s OS X family. Although there are many new technical features, it’s not loaded with flash. In fact, even experienced Mac users would be hard-pressed to notice that their system had even been updated!

As I mentioned in that post, I was most-interested in the potential to use Grand Central Dispatch and OpenCL to accelerate my system’s performance. Both features are supported on most Macs built over the last year or two, and they create a great foundation for future development. QuickTime X is interesting as well, though only Nvidia 9400M-based Macs (like my 2009 Mini) support it’s hardware-accelerated H.264 capabilities. The fact that so much of the operating system has been re-written using these modern capabilities is probably the biggest Snow Leopard feature.

Snow Leopard Does Not Boot 64-Bit…

I wasn’t all that concerned about whether the OS X kernel booted in 32-bit or 64-bit mode, but was intrigued to find that Snow Leopard boots with a 32-bit kernel on every Mac other than the rack-mount Xserve.

Much pre-launch discussion revolved around whether or not a given system was even capable of booting in 64-bit mode. There are three critical elements that determine whether a given machine will boot a 64-bit Snow Leopard kernel:

1. All system hardware must have 64-bit drivers, including the CPU, chipset, and peripheral chips. The 64-bit kernel exclusively uses 64-bit kexts (drivers), and these are rarer than the 32-bit ones used by Leopard.
2. It must use 64-bit EFI (firmware). Even though EFI32 can technically boot a 64-bit operating system just fine, Apple will not allow this. Only Macs made over the last few years include EFI64.
3. Apple must allow the system to boot in 64-bit mode. This is the most confusing. Many Macs will not boot Snow Leopard in 64-bit mode even though they are brand new, have no unusual hardware, and include EFI64. This includes all non-Pro MacBooks and Mac Minis.

So there you have it. No matter what you do, Snow Leopard will not boot with a 64-bit kernel and kexts on the majority of Macs. One could understand if there was a lack of drivers or some other technical limitation, as is the case with older Macs, the but this is not the case for the latest MacBook and Mac Mini systems. They won’t boot with a 64-bit kernel because the kernel refuses to boot.

The only Mac model that boots with a 64-bit kernel by default is the 2008 and 2009 Xserve (Xserve2,1 and Xserve3,1) running Snow Leopard Server. The following Macs can boot in 64-bit mode in non-server Snow Leopard if you hold down the 6 and 4 keys on boot or if you modify your “/Library/Preferences/SystemConfiguration/com.apple.Boot.plist” file as described at Netkas:

If your Mac is not included in this list, you will not be able to boot Snow Leopard in 64-bit mode. MacBook and Mac Mini models definitely will not boot into 64-bit Snow Leopard. The later Unibody MacBook Pros (5,3 and 5,4) are not listed, and it is not known if they work or not.

…But Why Do You Care?

Why do enthusiasts care so much about the “bitness” of their hardware and software? Geeks have been arguing over the merits of “bigger-bits” for decades. I remember Mac users claiming PCs were inferior because Macs used true 16-bit Motorola CPUs while PCs were stuck with an 8-bit bus. The gaming world did much to foster 64-bit mania, with Atari claiming their Jaguar was the first 64-bit console, and Nintendo even naming theirs the “N64″. But does it really matter?

In theory, a 64-bit operating system should make most-effective use of 64-bit CPUs, increasing performance and maximum addressable RAM. In the case of Intel CPUs, there are many improvements when running the 64-bit (x64) instruction set instead of legacy 32-bit (IA-32) mode. So, from a hardware perspective, 64 bits is definitely superior.

But Mac OS X can run 64-bit applications regardless of the bitness of the kernel. I am writing this post in 64-bit Safari running on a 32-bit Snow Leopard kernel. Many of the applications I normally run are 64-bit in Snow Leopard, including Safari, Mail, and the Finder. This last is important: All Snow Leopard users get a speedy 64-bit ground-up rewrite of Finder, which is their main operating system experience.

32-bit Snow Leopard runs 64-bit versions of many applications, including Safari, QuickTime X, iCal, Mail, and the Finder itself. Notable 32-bit apps include Microsoft Office, iTunes, and iPhoto.

Therefore, regardless of which kernel mode you have booted into, many of your daily activities will use full 64-bit applications. 64-bit versions of iTunes, iPhoto, and Microsoft Office might be nice, but they’re the exception not the rule, and I expect to see these move up to 64-bit soon.

Why do so many Macs not use the 64-bit version of Snow Leopard? One reason is compatibility: The 64-bit kernel requires a full set of 64-bit drivers, and these may have been lacking at launch. Another reason might be that these systems would not see much benefit from running a 64-bit operating system since they are limited to 4 GB of RAM. I would not be at all surprised if later point-revisions of OS X 10.6 enable booting in 64-bit mode by default, at least for the machines listed above and newer models. Those of us with older machines (like this MacBookPro3,1) might never see it, though.

I should note that there are a few 64-bit features lacking in 32-bit Snow Leopard. But some applications, including VMware Fusion, will not run at all under a 64-bit Snow Leopard kernel. And there is the question of driver compatibility. I am not an Apple apologist or fanboy, but I do use Macs 100% of the time for business and pleasure. I think it stinks that Apple now lags behind Microsoft in the race to provide a 64-bit desktop operating system. But the decision is understandable and it has little impact on the daily lives of end users.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2009. | No 64-Bit Snow Leopard Kernel For You!
This post was categorized as Apple, Computer History. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

Mac OS X 10.6 "Snow Leopard" deliveries begin on August 28!

Although Apple’s web site clearly states that Snow Leopard “Delivers on August 28th,” it is unclear if other sources will be so punctual. We definitely expect Apple Stores to have plenty of stock on Friday morning, but what of Amazon.com pre-orders? Will they also deliver on Friday, or will those of us who pre-ordered there have to wait a few days for this undercover upgrade?

Who Gets What

Snow Leopard is really a major jump forward in terms of advanced hardware and software integration. It brings Grand Central, OpenCL, full 64-bit mode, and QuickTime X along with Exchange support and many tweaks. But many of these features are highly hardware-dependent, so not all Mac users will get everything.

Here’s a cheat sheet I put together based on Apple’s documentation:

This table is based on the following facts:

1. Snow Leopard only supports Intel-based Macs. PowerPC Macs need not apply.
2. Booting Snow Leopard in 64-bit mode requires 64-bit EFI, and many pre-2007 Macs have only a 32-bit EFI. You can check your Mac (and help me fix my table) by typing “ioreg -l -p IODeviceTree | grep firmware-abi” in a Terminal window. If it says “EFI64″, your system is capable of running 64-bit Snow Leopard (though it can still run 64-bit apps). But Snow Leopard defaults to 32-bit mode on ALL Macs other than the Xserve at this point, and no one is sure why!
3. Grand Central Dispatch requires a multi-core CPU. This eliminates the original base-model 2006 Mac Mini, since it used a single-core CPU.
4. OpenCL requires newer Nvidia or the ATI graphics chips. This leaves out many pre-2008 models and some iMac and Mac Pro configurations. Check Apple’s list if you’re not sure.
5. QuickTime H.264 Hardware Acceleration only works with the Nvidia 9400M chipset. This leaves out many pre-2008 machines and even the latest Mac Pros, though they probably have enough horsepower on their own.

Finally, if you’re excited about the new Microsoft Exchange support in Mail.app, iCal, and the Address Book be warned! In order for any of this to work, your server must be running Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 1 Update Rollup 4. And most companies still aren’t updated that far!

Update: Check my follow-up post on 64-bit Snow Leopard for more about this controversial aspect!

I’m Updating!

I held off on Amazon and placed my own order this morning with Apple. I’m with Mark Twomey:Upgrading to Snow Leopard is a safe day-1 activity. Most of the updates amount to new under-the-hood features and the OS has been through round after round of testing. Unlike the massive shift from Tiger to Leopard (which I missed, being a late switcher), Snow Leopard ought to be a lesser upgrade.

Why make the update at all? Here are a few of my reasons:

1. It’s cheap: Just $29 to update a single Mac, or $49 for up to five. Compared to Microsoft’s (expired) “limited-time-only” (and incredibly complicated) Windows 7 upgrade, Apple sets out a red velvet carpet.
2. It’s easy: There’s just one version of Mac OS X, and any system running OS X 10.5 “Leopard” can update to full-on Snow Leopard. There are no editions and no conflicts updating from 32-bit to 64-bit (like Windows 7).
3. It future-proofs your (Intel) Mac: Mac developers have a long history of quickly leveraging new OS X features since Mac users have a long history of quickly upgrading. Snow Leopard adds cool stuff like Grand Central and OpenCL that my Intel- and Nvidia-based Macs ought to be able to leverage. See below if your Mac can use these, too!

Sure, there aren’t any amazing features like Time Machine to set the world on fire. But the Snow Leopard update is still a slam-dunk for any Intel-based Mac user! My Late-2007 MacBook Pro will get everything but H.264 acceleration and my 2009 Mac Mini is all set to go!

Updated with Mac Mini and Xserve information. Keep the suggestions coming and test that EFI! Picked up, colorized, and reused (with permission) by the excellent Ed Bott in his ZDNet column!

Note: Some of these links include affiliate codes that help pay for this blog. For example, buying an Amazon Kindle with this link sends a few bucks my way! But I don't write this blog to make money, and am happy to link to sites and stores that don't pay anything. I like Amazon and buy tons from them, but you're free to buy whatever and wherever you want.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2009. | Mac OS X 10.6 “Snow Leopard”: In Our Hands August 28!
This post was categorized as Apple, Personal. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

Apple pulled the plug in typical fashion on February 19, closing the online Apple store down and reopening without an announcement. Users were greeted by cheaper and expanded iPod Shuffles and a new rev of the Xsan SAN filesystem product. It was quickly noted that the latter now supported third-party Fibre Channel storage arrays, but little mention was made of Apple’s own FC array product, the Xserve RAID.

It turns out that there was a reason for the oversight. Visitors to the former home of the product on Apple’s web site were greeted instead with a splash page pointing them to Promise Technology’s VTrak E-Class array, and all documentation for Xsan 2 prominently features the Promise array. Users fumed, bloggers blogged, and Apple said nothing about the demise of their product.

Gizmodo finally teased something like an official statement from Apple later in the day. Apple’s Anuj Nayar admitted that the product was no more, and claimed the company would still sell drive modules “while supplies last.” SearchStorage.com got a much more official-sounding answer, but it remains the same: Xserve RAID is gone.
Users were having none of this. Although the Xserve RAID was outdated, with PATA disks and 2 Gb Fibre Channel, most expected a refresh. And they voiced exasperation with Apple’s quiet retirement and less-than-strong statements of continuing support for existing customers. A few users suggested stocking up on spares, while others defended Apple’s cutting off of a “non-core” product line.

At the end of the day, it does seem to be in Apple’s best interest to allow third parties to handle RAID array development and sales, as TidBITS points out. But it would have been a wiser choice to handle their often fanatical customers with more concern and forthrightness. At the very least, the company should issue a statement about the demise of the product and their continued support for existing customers.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2008. | Apple Customers Vent Over Ex-Xserve RAID
This post was categorized as Apple, Enterprise storage, Terabyte home. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

Let’s start with today’s good news. Apple updated Xsan with broader support for third-party Fibre Channel hardware, making a good product better. Although it requires Leopard, Xsan 2 now allows a single Mac to access multiple SAN devices, improving performance and flexibility. Geared towards the company’s primary professional customer base, Xsan lets a large number of Mac machines share Fibre Channel-connected volumes and file systems.

Now the bad news. I’ve long loved Apple’s simple Xserve RAID for the same reason I loved my old iPod – it was simple, lacking about half the features of my half-decade-old Nomad Jukebox, but so easy to use that I actually, you know, used it! The Xserve RAID was severely limited by comparison to every other enterprise storage array. No snapshots, thin provisioning, tiered storage, deduplication, etc, etc… But it worked. And that was plenty for the company’s core user base, especially if they were using it with Xsan, as probably 90% were. Before Microsoft coined “simple SAN”, Apple delivered it.

But no more. Now, the company redirects visitors to the old Xserve RAID URL to Promise’s web site, and their decent VTrak E-Class RAID system. This Fibre Channel RAID array is up to date with 4 Gb interfaces, SATA, and SAS, and, although basic, is not as stripped down as the old Apple product. But I’ll miss it. I especially loved the nifty LED activity bar graphs, the identifier buttons, and the Appley goodness of the industrial design.

Update: Yup, everyone is noticing the change now!

• TUAW: XServe Raid no longer available, Apple partners with Promise
• Computerworld: Apple outsources its server storage to Promise Technologies
• StorageMojo: Apple’s Xserve RAID bites the dust

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2008. | Apple Revs Xsan and Kills Xserve RAID?
This post was categorized as Apple, Enterprise storage. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.