I started by explaining a little bit about radio waves generally. “There are radio signals that are very low frequency, with a long wavelength, as well as those that are very high frequency.”

“What do you mean? What are radio signals?”

“Radio signals are like waves in water,” I said. My wife, the science teacher, quickly brought up a picture of the electromagnetic spectrum as an illustration. “There are tiny, ultra-high-frequency gamma rays and x-rays, as well as light waves in the middle and lower frequency radio waves.”

“So there are radio waves all around us right now?”

“Radio signals are like light, only in a color you can’t see,” I explained. “Every radio device sends it signals out in all directions, hoping an antenna will pick them up. And the spectrum of all these frequencies is divided up into segments like television channels.”

Big mistake: My TiVo-raised kids have no idea what a television channel is. But they had some idea about radio stations and could understand that different frequencies could contain different information.

So I transitioned into a discussion of congestion. “The phone and the computer are like flashlights, but it’s hard to see a flashlight in a bright room. If the room has blue lights, and you turn on a red flashlight, it will be obvious. But a blue one would be almost invisible!”

“So why is 5 GHz Wi-Fi so much faster than our old network,” asked the kids.

“There are 2 reasons,” I answered. “First, the 2.4 GHz spectrum used by regular Wi-Fi is really crowded, with lots of devices sharing it. Even telephones, cameras, and microwave ovens use that frequency! Second, 5 GHz has a lot more space for everyone to share, so much that you can even use wider channels.”

“Why don’t they just make more space for regular 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi?”

“They can’t! There’s just too many other people using radio signals around there, and they can’t move them around. The same thing happened in 900 MHz, and it might eventually happen in 5 GHz, too,” I explained. “It’s important that someone regulate who uses what frequency or it would be chaos. Imagine if anyone could drive in any direction anywhere on the highway!”

“It would be pretty cool to be able to see radio waves,” one of the kids commented.

“You can,” I answered. “A friend of mine makes a little device you plug into the computer, and it allows you to see all the signals in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. It’s used by Wi-Fi engineers to plan networks. My friend gave me one, if you’d like to see it!”

I grabbed my laptop and Wi-Spy DBx card, started VMware Fusion, and launched MetaGeek’s Chanalyzer application. In a few minutes, I had a screen full of signals in the 2.4 GHz range. Although we live in a quiet suburb with large lawns, there were dozens of devices sharing that paltry spectrum.

This is why we can't have nice things...

I then switched over to the 5 GHz band. After a moment, we saw our first 5 GHz signal. Then we saw some more, all clustered around channel 100. A quick option click on the Wi-Fi icon in the menu bar showed us that the Ruckus access point was indeed using channel 100. The only signal in the entire 5 GHz band was our own access point!

5 GHz is like a beautiful, open highway

After a while, we did see some others stray signals in the 5 GHz band. But Chanalyzer gave a wonderful visual demonstration of the contention in 2.4 GHz and the wide open spaces in 5 GHz.

I was even able to demonstrate the wider channels used by the Ruckus access point and my MacBook Pro. The kids walked away with a better understanding of electromagnetic waves, radio devices, and the rules that govern their use. Special thanks to Tech Field Day sponsors, Ruckus Wireless and MetaGeek for making this little demonstration possible!

Disclaimer: Ruckus Wireless and MetaGeek gave me the products mentioned in this post free of charge as part of Tech Field Day. I still may have had this conversation without them, but I wouldn’t have had such exciting visuals!

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2012. | Teaching Science with Wi-Fi (Thanks, Ruckus and MetaGeek!)
This post was categorized as Apple, Ask a Pack Rat, Personal, Terabyte home. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

Upgrade to VMware Fusion 3 for $9.99 until 2011

Are you a Parallels Desktop 5 user eager to jump to VMware Fusion? Or were you too cheap to move from Fusion version 1 or 2? Well now’s your big chance to upgrade from either product to a full VMware Fusion 3 license for under ten bucks!

I love VirtualBox, but spend most of my Mac OS X “Windows time” in VMware Fusion. I often have to jump to “the dark side” to run Visio or Outlook, and love the built-in speech-to-text feature in Vista and Windows 7. VMware Fusion has excellent Windows support and integration, especially when it comes to USB devices. I can easily switch my Blue Snowball microphone from OS X to Fusion on the fly with Fusion 3.1′s “EasyConnect”, and I wouldn’t have been able to update my Sony NEX-5 camera firmware without solid USB support.

Fusion 3 has lots of great features, including full Snow Leopard support, great 3D graphics capability, and SMP support. Performance has improved consistently from earlier versions as well, and I notice much less of a “hit” on my Mac performance while running Windows in Fusion 3.1. It also supports some of my favorite Linux distributions, including Ubuntu 10.04 in 64-bit mode.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2010. | Upgrade to VMware Fusion 3 For Just $9.99!
This post was categorized as Apple, Deals. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

But Windows Automatic Update is causing me trouble. It automatically restarts these virtual machines whenever there is an OS update, which seems to be every night lately. This automatic reboot kills whatever programs happen to be running at the time, causing me to lose half-written articles (even though I saved them and Auto Save is on) and almost killing an old BlackBerry I was updating. I had to figure out a way to disable this automatic reboot!

The answer is fairly simple. Just about every part of Windows can be tweaked using the surprisingly-friendly but scarily-named Group Policy Editor. Here’s how:

1. Log in as a user with Administrative access
2. Click the Windows circle thingy in the lower-left of the screen
3. In the “Search Programs and Files” box, type the following:

   gpedit.msc

4. Group Policy Editor is organized into a hierarchy. Open “Computer Configuration” then “Administrative Templates” and finally “Windows Components”
5. Scroll down to “No auto-restart with logged on users for scheduled automatic updates installations” and double click it.
6. In the window that pops up, select “Enabled” to disable the automatic reboots.
7. Click “OK” and you’re all set. You can quit GPEdit too.

Now, Windows will merely nag you about rebooting rather than dumping everything you’re working on in the middle of the night!

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2010. | How To Disable Windows 7 Automatic Reboot After Update
This post was categorized as Apple, Personal, Terabyte home. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

Here’s the scoop: Apple’s Mac mini EFI Firmware Update 1.2, released back at the end of August, claimed to improve “compatibility with the latest Apple memory kits on Mac mini computers”, but in typical Apple fashion, no one quite knew what that meant. Some brave soul must have tried installing two 4 GB PC3-8500 SO-DIMM modules in the Mini’s two RAM slots, and must have been awfully happy when they did, because it works! All 2009 Mac Minis are supported, including the recently-released Mac Mini Server and the earlier March-era machine.

This is now confirmed by Mac Mini Colo, a more reliable source than Macrumors forum posters, so I’m finally confident in posting this. Being a cheapskate, I’m not going to run out and spend $510.98 at Amazon on two Crucial SO-DIMMs for my $599 computer. But I’m eager to hear from you if you have the inclination, and will be watching as prices fall in the box at right. An 8 GB Mac Mini ought to perform amazingly when running VMware Fusion or VirtualBox!

Note: Some of these links include affiliate codes that help pay for this blog. For example, buying an Amazon Kindle with this link sends a few bucks my way! But I don't write this blog to make money, and am happy to link to sites and stores that don't pay anything. I like Amazon and buy tons from them, but you're free to buy whatever and wherever you want.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2009. | Got Excess Money? Upgrade Your 2009 Mac Mini RAM To 8 GB!
This post was categorized as Apple, Terabyte home. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

This last point has always been debatable as well. Apple tends to select higher-end x86 parts for their Macs and has led the way with innovative chassis, screen, and trackpad technology. But PC makers have quickly followed, offering part-for-part Apple clones at 80% of the cost. This week, however, I stumbled onto a concrete difference between Mac and PC hardware that has real-world impact: Across the board, Apple uses exclusive Intel CPUs with enhanced capabilities to support virtualization of 64-bit operating systems, including Windows 7′s special XP compatibility mode.

Virtualization-Ready

Virtualization hypervisors have become very widespread and popular, especially in the Apple world. Mac users regularly list Parallels Desktop and VMware Fusion among their favorite applications, since they open up the wide world of Windows applications running in a virtual machine. Although most daily tasks can be performed with native OS X applications, some apps just aren’t available.

Personally, I use Fusion on OS X with Windows Vista to occasionally run Microsoft’s Visio and Outlook, both of which aren’t available as native applications. I also use a 2009 Mac Mini as a server and virtual computer lab, mainly relying on Sun’s lightweight and free VirtualBox hypervisor. Although it isn’t impressive as the physical lab Dennis Martin described to me last week, I am able to run a variety of servers (Linux, Windows, and OS X) and other virtual gear (Windows Storage Server and FreeNAS) to simulate enterprise IT environments.

Windows users have less need to run virtualization applications: When your operating system commands over 90% of the market, a whole world of applications is at your fingertips! But enthusiasts and corporate IT types love virtualization, and VMware Server and Microsoft Hyper-V are commonly found on their Windows machines.

64-Bit Road Block

These popular virtualization packages support a wide range of modern hardware, but not everything works perfectly. Hypervisors had trouble with many tasks, particularly running 64-bit operating systems, until Intel and AMD introduced special hardware-assisted virtualization capabilities in their CPUs. The latest hypervisors and CPUs can now even virtualize 64-bit operating systems on top of 32-bit hosts!

But not all CPUs include this technology. Intel has a long history of artificially segmenting their product line by disabling certain features in low-end parts. For their Core 2 Duo “Merom” and “Penryn” lines, Intel decided that their VT virtualization technology would be the differentiator. Therefore, a lack of VT support is one of the main differences between low-end and high-end Intel Core 2 Duo CPUs.

Many of the latest portable and compact desktop systems use Intel’s Penryn-3M line, including Apple’s MacBook, MacBook Pro, and Mac Mini systems. See the issue here? Intel’s lower-end 2.0 GHz and 2.133 GHz CPUs (P7350 and P7450, respectively) don’t support VT, which means that systems using them don’t have the latest VT hardware virtualization capability and thus can’t run 64-bit virtual machines!

This is an issue for users of popular Sony Vaio, Dell Inspiron, and HP Pavilion PCs, and is likely to become much more important soon. See, Windows 7 includes a special XP compatibility mode, which is really just a virtual machine running XP under 7. But XP mode will not work without Intel VT or AMD-V. This means that XP mode in Windows 7 won’t work on the very mass-market machines that would benefit most from it!

Apple’s Different

This sounds terrible: The latest machines won’t run increasingly-popular virtualization software. But there is a very good reason that buyers of the latest Apple machines aren’t up in arms. It seems that Apple made a deal with Intel to get a special version of the Penryn-3M Core 2 Duo CPUs that do support Intel VT!

Apple’s latest Mac Mini, MacBook, and MacBook Pro all sport P7350 and P7450 CPUs, just like competing Dell, Sony, and HP machines. But the Apple CPUs have VT and the PCs lack it. The VT support is gone, and cannot be enabled in the PC BIOS.

So even a PC and Mac sporting the exact same CPU part numbers aren’t equal: Every recent Mac will run 64-bit Windows and XP mode in Windows 7 and many PCs won’t. And I can run anything I want on my Mac Mini virtual lab!

Update - Let me be very, very clear on the facts here:

• Most hypervisors now require Intel VT or AMD-V in order to virtualize 64-bit operating systems
• Microsoft requires this technology to use XP mode in Windows 7
• All current Apple Macs (including those that use P7350 and P7450 CPUs) have Intel VT support in their CPUs regardless of what Intel says on the model spec sheets
• Many PCs use high-end Intel and AMD CPUs that support VT or AMD-V, though some have this turned off in the BIOS
• No PC with an Intel P7350 or P7450 CPU has Intel VT support at all. It cannot be enabled in the BIOS because it does not exist.

I am not an Apple fanboy. I am a virtualization fanboy who is glad I bought a Mac Mini instead of a Dell Studio, HP TouchSmart, or Sony Vaio.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2009. | A Concrete Reason Macs Beat PCs: Intel VT
This post was categorized as Apple, Computer History, Terabyte home, Virtual Storage. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

Windows 7 RC literally hit home for me today. Seriously! Eight DVD copies of Windows 7 RC (32-bit) arrived in a FedEx from One Microsoft Way!

Microsoft just let loose a Release Candidate for Windows 7, the operating system that will bring peace, love, and joy to PC users everywhere and finally stop folks from switching to Macs instead of using Vista. Maybe.

So today I find myself in possession of eight DVD copies of Windows 7 RC (32-bit – boo!) for some reason. Maybe they sent them to all TechNet subscribers. Maybe all Microsoft MVPs got them. Regardless of the reason, I’m not sure what I’m supposed to do with them all. I already downloaded the DVD from TechNet after all!

Although perhaps not everything it’s been built up to be, Windows 7 is a seriously worthy upgrade from Vista. I’ve already switched my laptop to Windows 7 RC and am happy to report that it boots much faster, runs solidly, and thrashes less than it used to. It’s especially nice in virtual machines – Windows 7 in VMware Fusion and VirtualBox on my Mac is like night and day compared to Vista. It even runs great with only 512 MB of RAM, something Vista just can not do except in Basic guise.

I’m not using the OS too heavily (all my day-to-day work is done in Mac OS X) but I do want to point out some seriously nice features in Windows 7. These are also present in Windows Server 2008 R2, an operating system I’m much more interested in since I actually use it in production!

• DirectAccess and BranchCache are very cool additions. DA punches through firewalls like a VPN, but there’s no VPN client involved! It’s all based on standard Internet protocols like IPv6 and IPsec, kinda like Back To My Mac. BranchCache is also very nifty, creating a peer-to-peer or server-based distributed cache of a remote SMB file server. I’ve been playing with this and will report more on it eventually!
• BitLocker To Go applies Microsoft’s solid disk encryption technology to USB drives. It works. And Windows 7 now tries to help keep you from losing your keys, something I seriously need help with!
• PowerShell is spreading throughout the Windows and non-Windows world, and I’m loving it!
• VHD files are now first-class storage devices, and can be managed (and even booted from) just like any other drive. Sweet!
• Windows 7 also includes the new iSCSI initiator with QuickConnect. I’ll be covering this more soon!

So Windows 7 ought to keep some of the PC masses away from the Apple store. But I really didn’t need 8 copies of the DVD… What do you all suggest I do with them?

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2009. | Windows 7 Is Here! In My Hands! But Why 8 DVDs?
This post was categorized as Apple, Enterprise storage, Personal, Terabyte home. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

What Red Sox fan wouldn't want to open this gift?

What is the perfect gift for someone obsessed with Lego bricks and the Boston Red Sox? It would be easy to assume I was describing myself, but this time I’m talking about my 9 year old son. But both of us enjoyed his big birthday gift this year, a Lego model of Fenway Park!

No, the Lego Company hasn’t licensed the famous ballpark. But they do offer something almost as good – a build-to-order service called Lego Factory, which allows you to design your own Lego set on a PC or Mac and have it delivered to your door!

So, with equal parts enthusiasm and foolishness, I sat down this fall with my Mac, a copy of the Lego Digital Designer software, and numerous photos of my favorite landmark and started working.

Although the software is really excellent, it still took a month of evenings to get the park modeled to my satisfaction. It only offers a subset of a few hundred brick types to choose from, but the software let me snap, copy, rotate, and place the pieces with ease.

I had planned to build the whole darn park, inside and out, but reality got in the way. Luckily I started with the diamond, the famous Green Monster, and the unique field shape so I ended up with a recognizable and rewarding model. I did construct much of the Yawkey Way facade, but that will have to wait for next birthday!

Lego Digital Designer allowed me to select from a good assortment of pieces and build my model

Once I had my model built in the LDD software, I submitted it to the Lego Factory. I held my breath while waiting for a price, knowing Lego’s notoriously high pricing, but it wasn’t too bad: Around 750 pieces in a custom box, shipped for $88.34.

Delivery took the better part of a month, and no wonder: The stickers on the box indicate that it traveled through Poland, Hong Kong, Denmark, and JFK (via American Airlines) before arriving at my door in Ohio!

The custom box left something to be desired – it merely held a paper printout of the model behind a clear plastic window. And I was surprised to find all of the bricks in a single large plastic bag. In fact, the bag barely fit inside the box, and I think I was brushing against the upper size limit for Lego Factory orders!

Sadly, Lego’s software failed when it came to creating an instruction booklet. I imagine it could have handled a simpler model, but my default directions were bizarrely complicated, instructing me to put a single piece here and there over hundreds of steps.

My Lego Fenway Park is ready - Play ball

Instead, I had to export the model in the open LDraw format, which only Lego Digital Designer for Windows is apparently capable of. From there, I was able to open it in the solid freeware MLCad application and put together my own instruction booklet. All of this required Windows, but my Mac has VMware Fusion and Boot Camp, so that was no problem at all!

After a satisfyingly excited birthday-morning gift-opening session, we set about constructing “our” ballpark. Astonishingly, Lego included every piece required to build the model and not a single extra! It took a few evenings, but our playroom now holds a fairly large and detailed model of the Red Sox playing field and its surroundings.

Want your own copy of my model? Lego’s Factory web site lets you buy a model designed by someone else. So if you look around, you might find a model called “Ballpark 2″ and that’s mine. But I couldn’t find it. If you’re interested, I’ll email the model to you – get my address from the “About” page.

We are also planning on continuing to add to this model. My son is already planning how to build the club, and I’ve got Yawkey Way under way. I’ll post here when we progress further!

This is what a Lego minifigure on Landsdowne Street sees!

Update! By popular demand, here are the links for the sources for the field section pictured here. Note that Lego changes parts availability all the time. If Lego Digital Designer complains that it can’t be priced, just try again in a few days.

• Lego Digital Designer model file: Ballpark 2.LXF
• Instructions: Ballpark 2.PDF

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2009. | Lego Fenway Park: Reverse the Curse at Home
This post was categorized as Personal. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

If you haven’t already tried VirtualBox, you ought to. It works very well, virtualizing Windows and Linux guests on Windows, Linux, Solaris, and Mac hosts with respectable performance. One thing I really love about it is that it doesn’t bog down my Vista system like VMware with installed drivers and services. It just installs and works and gets out of the way when you’re not using it.

VirtualBox supports shared folders, USB, and has guest additions for Windows and Linux to provide resolution independence and performance boosts. The new 2.0 version adds 64-bit guest OS support for 64-bit hosts along with performance and stability fixes. The Mac version now has a native look and feel and better networking, too.

One really interesting twist for folks interested in desktop virtualization (aka VDI on VMware) is integration with remote desktop protocol (RDP). VirtualBox guests can be configured to act as RDP servers, with thin(ish) clients accessing them over a network and even sharing their USB devices seamlessly. I’m getting pretty excited about the desktop virtualization concept – I’ll be keeping my eyes on companies like stealthy Old Road Computing Virtual Computer to see what they’re up to!

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2008. | Sun’s Excellent VirtualBox Goes 2.0
This post was categorized as Apple, Virtual Storage. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

Yup, my Boot Camp drive icon is customized, too!

In my last post, I discussed the simple but confusing steps required to add custom icons to Mac OS X drives. I mentioned that there were some tricks to getting custom icons on some drives, however, including Boot Camp and NTFS disks. This week, I’ll show how to customize these as well.

There are two core problems with customizing drive icons for certain volumes:

1. OS X can’t directly write to anything but HFS+ and FAT, and this includes writing icons
2. OS X needs a special resource on the drive to indicate that the custom icon should be used, and only HFS+ supports this

But it’s easy enough to get around these limitations. Apple takes care of number 2, and we can cover number 1 in one of two ways.

This post is part of my series focused on Apple OS X tips and tricks.

• Access NTFS Volumes On Your Mac
• Clean Up Your Mac! Essential OS X Tidiness Tools and Techniques
• How To Move OS X Time Machine Backups To A New Disk
• Hallelujah! OS X Can Reduce PDF File Size!
• Custom Drive Icons in Mac OS X
• OS X Custom Drive Icons 2: Boot Camp and NTFS

Techie Bits

Booooooring generic USB drive icon in OS X

Old versions of Mac OS stored lots of data (aka “resources”) in the resource fork of a file, including icon graphics. However, this became a problem with the advent of networking and cross-platform computing, since no other popular personal computing platform supported two-fork files. OS X moves most resources into the data fork – although resource forks still exist, they are rarely used.

However, it appears to me that although the “icns” data for a drive icon is stored in the data fork of the .VolumeIcon.icns file, Apple still uses a pointer in the resource fork of the root directory of the drive to tell OS X to use that icon. In other words, when a drive is mounted, OS X seems to look in the resource fork of “.” for a flag that says “use the icon in .VolumeIcon.icns” before it will use the icon. I’m not sure this is the case, but I do know that .VolumeIcon.icns has no resource fork (even on HFS+), but it requires a special resource file on other filesystems.

Since only HFS and HFS+ support resource forks, this is a problem. Apple gets around this by saving resource fork data in files with “._” prepended to their name. So the resource fork of “index.html” would be “._index.html” on a FAT drive. Every FAT drive I’ve added a custom icon to includes a file called “._.”, which sounds like the root directory’s resource to me, and this is required for the icon to work.

Getting It Done

Aah, that's a much better icon for my Maxtor 3200!

So you need two files on a non-HFS+ drive to get the custom icon to work:
 

1. .VolumeIcon.icns – the same exact file as on an HFS+ volume, containing the icon data in the data fork
2. ._. – a special file (resource fork, perhaps?) which seems to tell OS X to use the icon

As illustrated previously, adding a custom icon to a FAT drive is exactly the same as on an HFS+ drive – create the icon resource and copy and paste it in the drive’s Info inspector. If we move these two files over to any other OS X-readable drive (including NTFS-formatted Boot Camp partitions), it will use the icon!

OS X can’t write to NTFS, so there are two ways to get these files onto an NTFS drive:

1. Make OS X write to NTFS by installing NTFS-3G
2. Copy the two files over in an OS like XP or Vista that can write to NTFS

[ad#vmware]The first method is simple, but not one I wanted to try. NTFS-3G is great – it’s a reverse-engineered open-source read/write driver for NTFS, and works on lots of platforms. But NTFS is finicky, and I’m not too keen on risking the integrity of the drive with an unsupported driver. If you want to use this method, though, customizing the icons is as simple as it is with FAT, once the driver is installed.

I used method 2 – relying on VMware Fusion to allow me to write the icon data to my NTFS drives and using a FAT-formatted flash drive as an intermediary between OS X and Vista. I created my icons, applied them to my flash drive, then booted up Vista in Fusion and copied the two files over in a DOS window. They’re hidden by default, but that shouldn’t slow you down.

Note that this only affects the icons in OS X – it will not allow you to customize the boot icons.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2008. | OS X Custom Drive Icons 2: Boot Camp and NTFS
This post was categorized as Apple, Virtual Storage. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

This post is part of my series focused on PC/Mac Integration.

• Vista, OS X Boot Time Compared
• Quick and Easy Bluetooth Sharing Between PC and Mac
• Yes, FireWire is Faster Than USB
• How to Keep an IOGear KVM from Dimming Your Mac's Screen
• Command and Control: The Clash of Keyboards

My test was simple: I used the iPhone’s stopwatch to time the following key events after startup:

1. The Mac Gong or disappearance of the PC or VMware BIOS screen
2. The appearance of the login box (I paused the timer at this point to give me time to enter my password)
3. The appearance of the desktop
4. I then clicked on the icons to launch my mail and web browser apps, assuming this would be the first thing most people would do on startup, and timed how long it took for each to load and present content
5. Finally, I stopped the clock when the system appeared usable – hourglasses disappeared, the disk stopped chugging like crazy, and all background apps had loaded and were running
6. I also timed how long it took for the system to power down after ordering a shutdown

Not surprisingly, the MacBook with OS X was fastest, though it took a surprisingly longish time to get Mail and Safari launched compared to Firefox and Outlook in Windows. OS X also excels at knocking off the backup tasks and giving a stable, ready-to-use system.

Booting Windows Vista Ultimate in Boot Camp was surprisingly speedy, too, and this was the core of my test. The Mac gave me a working Windows environment in just 2:15, compared to 1:40 for OS X and 3:10 for my Dell XPS M1330. I’m not sure exactly what the Dell is doing, but it churns and chugs for quite a while on bootup, even after I stopped the clock, and it’s got a nice clean install with few apps running.

Finally, I timed my Boot Camp volume in VMware Fusion (1.1.3) and found that, although it was speedy enough when it was running, it took 30 seconds longer to get started than booting natively. But even Fusion was quicker than the Dell.

My feeling is that Microsoft has spent some time optimizing the startup experience in Vista, trimming the time it takes to get a login window and desktop by shifting some work to background tasks that interfere with usability once the system appears to be running. A clever trick, that, but one that frustrates me on a daily basis as I stare at a desktop full of icons that I can’t use quite yet.

Once again, this is not the most scientific test ever, but it helps to show what I feel about the Mac:

• It’s quicker when I want to sit down and start working
• Windows is much quicker on the Mac than the Dell, despite only slightly better specs (2.2/4 GB vs. 2.0/2 GB)

I ran each test a few times, and although they varied by a few seconds they were fairly consistent.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2008. | Vista, OS X Boot Time Compared
This post was categorized as Apple, Personal, Terabyte home. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.