<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat &#187; VMDirectPath Archives  &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/tag/vmdirectpath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
			<item>
		<title>Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, January 21, 2011</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/23/pile-interesting-links-january-21-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/23/pile-interesting-links-january-21-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Plankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chad Sakac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[converged I/O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCoTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Langemak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetEx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Drummonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Field Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Exec Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMDirectPath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VNXe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=4797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week was cut short by attendance at EMC's "Record Breaking" product launch. I covered the shenanigans and marketing antics already, and will dive deeper into the technical and product announcements later. Next week I'll be at The Exec Event in Palo Alto, but have some posts ready to roll while I'm away!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week was cut short by attendance at EMC&#8217;s &#8220;Record Breaking&#8221; product launch. I covered the <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/18/emc-taunts-netapp-counting-coup-poor-sportsmanship/"  target="_blank">shenanigans</a> and <a href="http://foskettservices.com/2011/01/when-marketing-becomes-pointless/"  target="_blank">marketing antics</a> already, and will dive deeper into the technical and product announcements later. Next week <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/11/execevent-palo-alto/"  target="_blank">I&#8217;ll be at</a> <a href="http://theexecevent.com"  target="_blank">The Exec Event</a> in Palo Alto, but have some posts ready to roll while I&#8217;m away!</p>
<ul class="scrd_digest">
<li>My writing
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.networkcomputing.com/next-gen-network/is-nfs-a-viable-protocol-for-converged-networking.php" > Is NFS A Viable Protocol For Converged Networking?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/18/emc-taunts-netapp-counting-coup-poor-sportsmanship/" >EMC Taunts NetApp: Counting Coup or Poor Sportsmanship?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://foskettservices.com/2011/01/when-marketing-becomes-pointless/" >When Marketing Becomes Pointless</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/stephen/netex-joins-roster-tech-field-day-presenters/" > NetEx Joins the Roster of Tech Field Day Presenters</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Other great stuff
<ul>
<li>Bob Plankers takes his turn at bat for FCoTR with a <a href="http://lonesysadmin.net/2011/01/20/fibre-channel-over-token-ring-presentation-wi-vmug/" rel="external" >Fibre Channel over Token Ring Presentation @ WI VMUG</a></li>
<li>This old post by Scott Drummonds about <a href="http://vpivot.com/2010/06/09/vmdirectpath/" rel="external" >VMDirectPath</a> is worth revisiting!</li>
<li>I couldn&#8217;t have said it any better, Louis: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LouisgraycomLive/~3/ayDOsk4HD_w/best-thing-apple-does-is-ignore.html" rel="external" >The Best Thing Apple Does Is Ignore Everyone Else</a></li>
<li>Chad Sakac and the gang were great hosts last week. Here&#8217;s more about their cool new tiny array: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://virtualgeek.typepad.com/virtual_geek/2011/01/vnxe-incredible-things-in-tiny-transformer-like-packages.html" rel="external" >VNXe = incredible things.. in tiny, transformer-like packages!</a></li>
<li>Jon Langemak&#8217;s post on <a href="http://www.dasblinkenlichten.com/?p=291" rel="external" >SAN Terminology</a> is worth reading for newbies to the storage scene</li>
<li>Finally, <a href="http://jcieplinski.posterous.com/further-clarification-from-google-about-h264" rel="external" >Further clarification from Google about h.264</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Subscribe to <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/sfoskett" rel="me"  target="_blank">my Google Reader feed</a> or <a href="http://twitter.com/sfoskett" rel="me"  target="_blank">follow me on Twitter</a> to see these in real-time.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/03/18/pile-interesting-links-march-18-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, March 18, 2011</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/03/25/pile-interesting-links-march-25-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, March 25, 2011</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/04/01/pile-interesting-links-april-1-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, April 1, 2011</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/17/pile-interesting-links-january-14-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, January 14, 2011</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/28/pile-interesting-links-january-28-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, January 28, 2011</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/23/pile-interesting-links-january-21-2011/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2011. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/23/pile-interesting-links-january-21-2011/">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, January 21, 2011</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/apple/" title="View all posts in Apple" rel="category tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/" title="View all posts in Everything" rel="category tag">Everything</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/personal/" title="View all posts in Personal" rel="category tag">Personal</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/23/pile-interesting-links-january-21-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storage Changes in the VMware vSphere 4 Family</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gestalt IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPath/VE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PVSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SATP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage VMotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin provisioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMDirectPath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=1775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware officially launched their next-generation (version 4) enterprise family of products today under the "vSphere 4" name. As I've been doing for the last few major ESX releases, I'm focusing this post on the storage changes present in vSphere 4.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware officially <a href="http://www.vmware.com/landing_pages/nextgen.html"  target="_blank">launched</a> their next-generation (version 4) enterprise family of products today under the &#8220;vSphere 4&#8243; name. As I&#8217;ve been doing for the last few major ESX releases, I&#8217;m focusing this post on the storage changes present in vSphere 4.</p>
<blockquote><p>For more information on earlier updates, see my articles:</p>
<ul>
<li><em><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/"  target="_self">Storage Fixes in VMware ESX Server 3.5 Update 2</a></em></li>
<li><em><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/11/07/storage-vmware-esx-update-3/"  target="_blank">Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 3</a></em></li>
<li><em><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/03/31/storage-vmware-esx-35-update-4/" >Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 4</a><br />
 </em></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>One first step is VMware&#8217;s whitepaper, &#8220;<a href="http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/VMW_09Q1_WP_vSphereStorage_P10_R1.pdf"  target="_blank">What&#8217;s New in VMware vSphere 4: Storage</a>&#8220;.<span id="more-1775"></span></p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Licensing and Availability of Features</h3>
<p>The most important change at a glance is in the licensing model for VMware.</p>
<ul>
<li>A new low-end &#8220;standard&#8221; level includes all of the components a small business might need, including thin provisioning of storage, at a very attractive price.</li>
<li>The &#8220;advanced&#8221; level includes advances in the area of data protection.</li>
<li>At the &#8220;enterprise&#8221; level, live migration of storage is enabled.</li>
<li>Top of the heap is &#8220;enterprise plus&#8221;, which enables the intriguing plug-in third-party multipathing support previously rumored.</li>
<li>Enterprise customers with current support will get vStorage thin provisioning and data protection when they upgrade.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_1777" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 529px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;"><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/vspher4.jpg" ><img class="size-full wp-image-1777" title="vspher4" src="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/vspher4.jpg" alt="Each step up the licensing ladder enables important new storage features" width="519" height="444" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">Each step up the licensing ladder enables important new storage features (source: VMware)</p></div>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Thin Provisioning</h3>
<p>One of the most widespread storage features is native thin provisioning. VMware <strong>ESX 4 will allocate storage in 1 MB chunks</strong> as capacity is used. This isn&#8217;t really completely new &#8211; similar support was enabled by default for virtual disks on NFS in VI 3, and thin provisioning could be enabled on the command line for block-based storage as well. It was also present in VMware&#8217;s desktop products, including my own copy of Fusion. And <strong>ESX allows thick-to-thin conversion</strong> during Storage VMotion.</p>
<p>The difference with vSphere 4 is that thin provisioning is fully supported and integrated into every version of ESX. Although <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/tag/thin-provisioning"  target="_blank">many storage arrays now also offer thin storage</a>, the addition of native, integrated thin provisioning right in ESX is huge. This alone will be a major capacity (and thus, cost) savings feature! VMware claims 50% storage savings in their lab tests.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Dynamic Expansion of VMFS Volumes</h3>
<p>VMFS volumes can now grow (and, in some cases, shrink) online without resorting to spanning to a new LUN. Under vSphere 4, VMFS volumes can grow to take advantage of expanded LUNs (up to 2 TB per LUN). The old method still works as well, and multi-LUN spanned VMFS volumes can grow when any of their LUNs is expanded.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Enhanced Storage VMotion</h3>
<p>Like thin provisioning, Storage VMotion has been elevated to first-class status, supported just about everywhere you&#8217;d want it. It&#8217;s in all the likely spots within vCenter.</p>
<p>Storage VMotion gives serious storage flexibility now, enabling (almost) any-to-any migration of VMFS volumes: Pick up a Fibre Channel, iSCSI, or NFS disk image and move it to another datastore running any of those protocols to convert live. And you can do thick-to-thin provisioning at the same time.</p>
<p>Under the hood, the whole infrastructure has been revised. Storage VMotion leverages VMware&#8217;s change block tracking instead of disk snapshots now, speeding up the migration process and reducing the (formerly excessive) memory and CPU requirements of Storage VMotion in 3.5. This is the same technology leveraged by vSphere&#8217;s High Availability features, by the way.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Pluggable Storage Architecture (PSA)</h3>
<p>Only &#8220;Enterprise Plus&#8221; licensees will get to use it, but the vSphere family also sports a new <a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/03/19/pluggable-storage-architecture-exploring-the-next-version-of-esxvcenter/"  target="_blank">pluggable storage architecture (PSA)</a> which will initially be leveraged to deliver vendor-specific multipath support. Note that the native multipath support in vSphere continues to be a basic round-robin or fail-over system &#8211; it will not dynamically load balance I/O across multiple paths or make more intelligent decisions about which paths to use.</p>
<div id="attachment_1779" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 518px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;"><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-1.png" ><img class="size-full wp-image-1779" title="picture-1" src="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-1.png" alt="vSphere 4's Pluggable Storage Architecture allows third-party developers to replace ESX's storage I/O stack" width="508" height="224" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">vSphere 4&#39;s Pluggable Storage Architecture allows third-party developers to replace ESX&#39;s storage I/O stack (source: VMware)</p></div>
<p>As you may gather from this VMware illustration (but would probably miss since it&#8217;s not all that comprehensible), there are two classes of third-party plug-ins:</p>
<ol>
<li>Basic path-selection plugins (PSPs) will merely optimize the choice of which path to use, ideal for active/passive type arrays</li>
<li>Full storage array type plugins (SATPs) will allow load balancing across multiple paths in addition to path selection for active/active arrays</li>
</ol>
<p>EMC also announced <strong><a href="http://chucksblog.emc.com/chucks_blog/2009/04/vsphere-as-an-io-engine.html"  target="_blank">PowerPath/VE</a></strong><a href="http://chucksblog.emc.com/chucks_blog/2009/04/vsphere-as-an-io-engine.html"  target="_blank"> for vSphere</a>, integrating their popular multi-platform path management software directly into ESX. It&#8217;s not clear at this point whether PowerPath will require an Enterprise Plus license (or if it will come with one) or if it will work with all editions, but I&#8217;m sure that will be clarified soon. My EMC contacts do tell me that PowerPath/VE is licensed on a per-socket basis (like VMware of yore) and that EMC sales reps have some room to get creative on licensing.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">iSCSI Software Initiator Enhancements</h3>
<p>It&#8217;s harder to claim it as a new feature, but the iSCSI software initiator has also been tweaked and tuned to use less CPU time and deliver better throughput. The iSCSI configuration process has also been smoothed out so one no longer needs to have a live Service Console connection in order to communicate with an iSCSI target. And changes made in the general tab are now global, so they&#8217;ll propagate down to each target. Bi-directional CHAP is also added, so the target can now be authenticated in addition to the initiator.</p>
<p>vSphere also includes a paravirtualized iSCSI driver (PVSCSI) which works like vmxnet to present a higher-performance iSCSI adapter within certain supported guest OSes.</p>
<p>More information on multipathing iSCSI can be found at <a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/03/18/iscsi-multipathing-with-esxcliexploring-the-next-version-of-esx/"  target="_blank">Yellow Bricks</a> and in Chad Sakac&#8217;s <a rel="nofollow" href="http://virtualgeek.typepad.com/virtual_geek/2009/01/a-multivendor-post-to-help-our-mutual-iscsi-customers-using-vmware.html"  target="_blank">mega-post</a> on the topic.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">High-Performance I/O</h3>
<p>vSphere really pours on the I/O power. They claim a 3x increase, to &#8220;over 300,000 I/O operations per second&#8221;, but mentioned in the launch that they&#8217;ve gotten to 400,000 in some workloads. This is really amazing, and if it&#8217;s true in real-world use means that VMware ESX can now host just about any application you can think of.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny, but just a few weeks before the announcement VMware&#8217;s Chief Data Center architect, Scott Davis, told me at Storage Networking World that vSphere would double I/O performance. I thought this was a bold statement at the time, but VMware went further in their official documents, claiming 3x improvement. Now we have an on-stage admission that it could be up to 4x! This is serious stuff, folks: <strong>Can VMware really do 400,000 IOPS</strong>?</p>
<p>One question is whether these IOPS improvements require the new VMDirectPath I/O for Storage, which binds a physical Fibre Channel HBA to a single guest OS, or if they&#8217;re generalized across all systems.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">vCenter Improvements</h3>
<p>vCenter now includes <a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/04/20/storage-views-exploring-the-next-version-of/"  target="_blank">more storage information</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li>Each VM and ESX in the inventory has a tab showing storage information and allowing users to set alarms on storage use &#8211; setting capacity alarms becomes extremely important when thin provisioning is used!</li>
<li>vCenter inventory has a view showing datastore details</li>
<li>There&#8217;s also a nice storage topology map</li>
</ul>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Data Protection APIs (Updated)</h3>
<p>VMware also enhanced the APIs for consolidated backup (VCB) into &#8220;vStorage Data Protection&#8221;. <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Available only with Advanced or Enterprise licenses</span>, these APIs allow enterprise backup vendors to develop specific integration with VMware without VCB in the middle.  All versions of ESX include this vStorage API and boast VCB support. Standard and Essentials licenses do not include vCenter Data Recovery, a standalone disk-to-disk backup capability for virtual machines.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Conclusion</h3>
<p>vSphere is loaded with storage improvements, though many seem like incremental updates rather than new features. Admins will welcome thin provisioning support, and the full integration of Storage VMotion is certainly welcome, but I think the changes to vCenter will be most noticeable. I&#8217;ll be looking into EMC&#8217;s PowerPath/VE and the amazing I/O improvements as we move forward and learn more about the next ESX!</p>
<p>Duncan Epping posted much more <a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/04/21/vsphere-linkage/" >vSphere Linkage</a> on his Yellow Bricks blog if you&#8217;re interested in non-storage features. I also suggest reading Chris Evans&#8217; outline of <a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/04/21/enterprise-computing-vmware-announce-vsphere-4/"  target="_blank">vSphere storage changes</a>.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/07/16/vmware-vsphere-5-storage/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Changes in VMware vSphere 5</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/06/06/vmware-esx-vsphere-satp-psp-support-matrix/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">VMware PSP and SATP in Plain English</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/22/emc-powerpath-vmware-hyperv/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">PowerPath To The Virtual People</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/11/11/vmware-vasa/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">What is VMware VASA? Not Much (Yet)</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/01/26/essential-vmware-esx-iscsi/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Essential Reading for VMware ESX iSCSI Users!</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2009. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/">Storage Changes in the VMware vSphere 4 Family</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/gestaltit/" title="View all posts in Gestalt IT" rel="category tag">Gestalt IT</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/virtualstorage/" title="View all posts in Virtual Storage" rel="category tag">Virtual Storage</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

