Many enterprise SSD makers are familiar to storage folks like myself, including Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Imation, Intel, Samsung, Seagate, and Toshiba. Readers of my blog may also recognize Fusion-io, LSI, Micron, OCZ Technology, Texas Memory Systems, and Viridant from my recent coverage, and may have heard of Solid Access Systems, Anobit, Pliant (now part of SanDisk), and others. But some names remain unfamiliar, at least for now. And others, notably Nimbus Data and Violin Memory, are puzzlingly missing from the StorageNewsletter list.

So here’s my rundown of the enterprise SSD makers to keep an eye on in the coming year!

For fun, I am grouping these by how much contact I had with them over the previous year. Although obviously not the most scientific measure of their impact on the storage world, perhaps this will help highlight those that are reaching out to independent bloggers like myself.

Well-Known SSD Players

See also Micron Bursts Into the PCIe SSD Market

First up is a group of companies that I’m quite familiar with, having recently been briefed on their SSD plans and products.

1. LSI
2. Micron
3. Nimbus Data
4. Texas Memory Systems

Next is a list of companies that, although I have contacts of one sort or another, I eagerly anticipate future briefings regarding SSD technology.

1. Anobit
2. Intel
3. Fusion-io
4. Hitachi GST
5. Seagate Technology
6. Stec
7. Violin Memory

SSD Contenders

See also Toshiba Offers “Blade” SSDs (Like Apple’s MacBook Air)

I have spotted the following companies at conferences, in industry publications, and on the web and feel that I am somewhat familiar with their SSD plans. But I welcome any opportunity to get to know them better, and encourage them to contact me via e-mail or by telephone.

1. OCZ Technology
2. Imation
3. Samsung
4. SanDisk / Pliant Technology
5. Solid Access
6. Toshiba
7. Viking Modular Solutions
8. Virident Systems

Who?!?

I was surprised to see this set of companies listed in the StorageNewsletter article, and more surprised when I went to their website and found that they were working on genuine and interesting enterprise SSD products. I would love to get in contact with folks at these companies so I can learn more about what they are up to!

1. BiTMICRO Networks
2. Foremay
3. Macrotron Systems
4. pureSilicon
5. RunCore
6. Smart Modular Technologies
7. Super Talent

Stephen’s Stance

In all, I located 25 companies that build solid-state storage devices for the enterprise market. My quick examination of their websites (or previous knowledge of the companies) reveals a wonderful and vibrant culture of innovation around solid-state storage technology. Watch this space over the next year, since I intend to cover the SSD space in detail!

I would like to thank Jean-Jacques Maleval for spurring my research into these enterprise SSD companies. He is really doing a great job over at StorageNewsletter, and I recommend that you subscribe!

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2011. | My Incomplete, Subjective List of Enterprise SSD Companies
This post was categorized as Enterprise storage, Personal, Virtual Storage. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

Hard disk drive makers are adding flash storage to their conventional spinning-platter drives to improve performance and are targeting the performance PC market. Wait a second, haven’t we seen this before? As Rocky eventually said to Bullwinkle, “but that trick never works!”

Flash as a Cache

Using flash memory as a disk cache is a pretty good idea. Flash has awesome random read performance and fairly good write speed (compared to a hard disk drive, at least). That’s why more and more enterprise storage vendors are adding flash as a disk cache, not just a plain tier of storage.

EMC is the latest to make the move, announcing “FAST Cache” for their midrange Clariion and Celerra enterprise storage systems last week. They join NetApp, Sun, and others already offering similar capability. Fusion-IO has been the champion PCIe flash provider, but STEC is expected to join them soon.

See my post, Is Flash A Disk Or A Cache?

Flash-as-a-cache hasn’t been as easy to roll out as flash-as-a-disk, but it promises to be more effective. An array that completely integrates flash can take advantage of its positives (fast random read, fast-ish write, low power) without stumbling over its shortcomings (big write blocks, shorter lifespan).

Flash in a Disk

Although EMC is doing the right thing by adding FAST Cache, their implementation uses disk drive form factor flash rather than the PCI cards selected by others. It may prove more-difficult to optimize the system for the characteristics of flash when one is writing through a conventional disk drive interface like Fibre Channel or SAS. Would-be flash-and-platter drives face the same issue: How do you use flash effectively when it’s abstracted from the server and presented as a conventional disk?

The hybrid hard disk drive (H-HDD) method, rolled out back in 2007, added ATA commands allowing a compatible operating system to specify whether data sent to a hybrid drive should be written to flash or disk. These products were paired with Windows Vista’s ReadyBoost and SuperFetch to produce performance gains that never materialized in practice. The so-called “ReadyDrive” has become a footnote in history, along with Intel’s “Robeson” effort to add a flash cache to the motherboard.

It is unclear what the new generation of hybrid hard drives allegedly on the drawing boards at Toshiba and Seagate would look like. It is unlikely that they would use the H-HDD interface, but they will likely be aimed at the same performance laptop and desktop market. Servers have continued migrating towards advanced enterprise storage systems that pack their own cache, reducing the impact of bare hybrid drives.

Ingredients for Success

Rather than repeat the mistakes of the past, these companies could integrate real smarts into the disk controller, allowing it to autonomously move data to the flash cache to improve everyday performance without any special operating system support. This “tiered storage in a can” approach might deliver the goods that old-fashioned H-HDDs never could.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2010. | Hybrid SSD/Hard Disk Drives: This Time For Sure!
This post was categorized as Enterprise storage, Terabyte home, Virtual Storage. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

I write about technology and gadgets. One truism that’s especially true of this world is “Nil novi sub sole” – there’s nothing new under the sun. Most new electronics, from flashing trinkets to data center whales, incorporate existing technologies, often in non-novel ways. Another useful metaphor is “standing on the shoulders of giants.” But this post isn’t about metaphors or even technology. It’s about people who have to shoot their mouths off.

“Macs are just expensive PCs,” some say, or “the iPad is a giant iPod Touch.” No kidding. Really? You mean Saint Jobs and Company used common components and didn’t invent every part of their new kit? That’s a total shock to me! Next you’ll tell me that the iPod Touch was just a de-phoned iPhone or that the iPhone incorporated multi-touch technology developed somewhere other than Cupertino. Or that Apple copied Xerox when they made the Mac.

Seriously, folks. I know this. I do. Everything (and I mean everything) is based on something that existed before it. There are no totally out-of-left-field ideas. Nothing new under the sun. But this doesn’t mean there is no innovation. The iPad is important not because of what it’s made of but because of what that combination of ingredients allows you to do. It’s innovative despite its components. Same for the iPhone. Same for Windows Phone 7 and Android. These things are cool, no matter what they are built of.

Yesterday I posted about a new SDRAM-based solid-state drive from STEC. I called it a scoop because, even though it wasn’t announced yet, Chris Mellor spotted it on the floor at EMC World, asked me about it, and I dug up the details. STEC has only ever made flash-based SSDs and is now making a SDRAM-based one. That’s news. I don’t care that 15 other companies thought of using DRAM for storage dating back 20 years (ahem, EMC!) They aren’t STEC and they didn’t reveal this new product on Monday.

So why, then, did I get all sorts of “we/they did that first” comments? Did they really add to the conversation? Was it sour grapes that I was talking about STEC instead of some other company? Or, even worse, was it merely advertising-as-comment, desperately pointing out one’s own products while pretending to engage in social media? This is the equivalent of a Target spokesman hanging around at Wal Mart stores and whispering to the “other shoppers” that they sell razor blades even cheaper. It’s dishonest, disingenuous, and dishonorable. Let’s just call it anti-social media.

Some weren’t like this. Some said “that’s cool” and engaged in conversation about it. Yes, they might work for a company that makes something similar, but they were smart enough not to deny that other companies products deserve attention, too. We all get our turn to shine.

So I would like to challenge everyone who reads my blog. Are you adding to the conversation? Are you discussing the merits of a product or technology? Or are you trying to disrupt that conversation and turn attention to your own offerings? I’d like to thank the former and warn the latter: People are smart, and they’ll spot a phony.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2010. | Ask Yourself: Is This Response Adding To The Conversation?
This post was categorized as Personal. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

STEC has introduced ZeusRAM, a SDRAM-based drive

The ZeusRAM is small (just 8 GB) but STEC claims massive performance: 80,000 IOPS for both read and write (versus 80,000 read and 45,000 write for the 6 Gb SAS ZeusIOPS) and 500 MB/s sustained read and write (versus 350 and 300 for the ZeusIOPS). These numbers are well beyond the capabilities of whole shelves of traditional hard disk drives.

Should it lose power, the ZeusRAM will de-stage its content to flash RAM using power stored on internal super-capacitors. This is a major differentiator from in-system RAM disks which require whole-system battery backup and software to de-stage.

STEC has not announced pricing or availability information for the ZeusRAM drive at this point. We noted much interest in the drive from EMC staff at the EMC World show, and would not be surprised to see the ZeusRAM show up in a future Symmetrix or CLARiiON.

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2010. | STEC Spills the Beans on ZeusRAM SSD
This post was categorized as Enterprise storage, Gestalt IT. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

Frankenweenie saves young Victor in Tim Burton's macabre short film

When is a solution integrated and when is it a Frankenstein-like mashup of tangled tech? Apparently, that line is crossed when it’s your competitor’s offering…

In my time in the storage industry, I’ve seen enough franken-storage come and go to make me skeptical whenever a new “integrated” solution is announced. But a lot of this stuff works just fine, so I also know that integrated solutions aren’t always bad!

The latest industry blog flame war centers around NetApp’s recently-announced solid state storage solution, which pairs a V-Series NAS head and a Texas Memory Systems RamSan-500 flash storage system. Perhaps NetApp’s Val Bercovici did get a bit over-excited in his post on the topic, but he wasn’t just talking about the RamSan: He was laying out how NetApp’s WAFL technology can work in an SSD world, and using some recent performance test numbers on that solution as well as their PAM cache cards as an illustration of this.

The next thing you know, we have EMC’s Storagezilla and IBM’s Barry Whyte calling the company out for what they (and others. like Storagebod) see as an underwhelming product offering. That’s all well and good, and I’ll let the reader decide if NetApp’s moves warranted a press release, but now things have gotten uglier…

EMC’s Chuck Hollis called the whole RamSan idea to account, saying it was “Frankenstorage“, causing NetApp’s Alex MacDonald to engage in a little “I know you are but what am I” in reference to EMC’s CLARiiON/Celerra “unified storage” solutions.

It’s time to bring some sanity to this whole integrated solution concept. Every product in the storage world is an amalgamation of OEM parts to one extent or another, and there are always integration issues. Certainly many of EMC’s offerings could be the subject of name-calling: They use STEC SSD drives in the DMX, they use Quantum deduplication engines in their CDLs, and their Celerra NS platform does include a complete Fibre Channel SAN behind the curtain. But they’re not alone, and not even wrong in doing this: Every vendor relies on OEMs, and as a wise man said, “working with an OEM gives you the flexibility to pick best of breed technologies” and that’s exactly what customers want. Any objective person would welcome qualification and integration of TMS’ RamSan with a solid platform like the NetApp V-Series – it’s a certifiable win for the customer. Just like they would be happy to see EMC leveraging great technology from Quantum and STEC.

Chuck goes on to point out some downsides to these OEM combinations, and they’re certainly fair criticisms:

• When you’re buying this from this guy and that from that guy, it’s bound to cost more because everyone needs their cut.
• Since all attempts at unified heterogeneous device management have failed, a combo is certainly harder to manage than a single device.
• With multiple vendors in the mix, fingerpointing is common once support is needed.

But these criticisms can be mitigated by the vendors themselves. They can give up some margin in order to gain market share. They can create unified management interfaces for the combinations they sell and support. And they can really support what they sell, refusing to give in to the temptation to say “not my problem” when the going gets rough. And companies deal with these problems all the time! Frankenstorage doesn’t have to be so scary…

This post can also be found on Gestalt IT: The Difference Between “Integration” and “Frankenstein”

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2009. | The Difference Between “Integration” and “Frankenstein”
This post was categorized as Enterprise storage, Gestalt IT. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.

The Register did a nice job of summing up the (late 2008) flash positioning of the various storage companies, and I recently posted a strategic look at this core issue. Note that some, like HP and Sun (and probably IBM), seem to have an end-to-end strategy, while others are firmly in one camp or the other. In the “not yet” column, apparently, are 3PAR, BlueArc (though they offer TMS RAM), Dell/EqualLogic, HP/LeftHand.

Update: 3PAR has joined the “disk” camp.

It’s a Cache

Fusion-IO has rocketed to the forefront of the cache side with their PCI Express flash boards for servers. Joining them in this position are the following companies:

• HP (blades and servers)
• NetApp (PAM read cache card)
• Pillar (Slammer cache)
• Sun (read and write cache)

It’s a Disk

STEC is the darling of the flash-as-a-disk world, though Intel, Marvell, and Samsung are also playing here. Joining them in the corner are the following:

• EMC (STEC flash drives shipping the DMX now and CLARiiON in the future)
• Compellent (flash drives)
• HDS (flash drives in the USP-V)
• HP (flash drives in the MSA, perhaps, and maybe that Oracle thing)
• IBM (Fusion-IO storage behind SVC and standard flash drives in the DS5000)
• LSI (flash drives in the 7900)
• NetApp (ssd drives)
• Pillar (flash drives)
• Sun (flash drives in Thumper and JBOD)
• Xiotech (flash drives in the next Emprise canisters)
• 3PAR (flash drives in InServe)

So there you have it. It’s both a disk and a cache, depending on whether you sell servers or arrays apparently. If you sell both, it’s both. Simple!

If anyone wants to correct any of this, drop me a line or comment below!

See my posts on Gestalt IT for similar enterprise IT infrastructure commentary

© sfoskett for Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat, 2008. | Is Flash A Disk Or A Cache?
This post was categorized as Enterprise storage, Virtual Storage. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.