<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat &#187; SAN filesystem Archives  &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/tag/san-filesystem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
			<item>
		<title>Apple Revs Xsan and Kills Xserve RAID?</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/02/19/apple-revs-xsan-and-kills-xserve-raid/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/02/19/apple-revs-xsan-and-kills-xserve-raid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fibre Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN filesystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xsan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xserve RAID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/02/19/apple-revs-xsan-and-kills-xserve-raid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has an odd relationship with enterprise computing. Their Xserve server products are strong, as is Leopard Server, and they have an excellent SAN file system, Xsan, that they just updated. Yet, Mac OS X is the last major operating system with no volume manager (thanks to the antiquated HFS+), and it looks like the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has an odd relationship with enterprise computing.  Their <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.apple.com/xserve/"  target="_blank">Xserve server products</a> are strong, as is <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/"  target="_blank">Leopard Server</a>, and they have <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.apple.com/xsan/"  target="_blank">an excellent SAN file system, Xsan, that they just updated</a>.  Yet, Mac OS X is the last major operating system with no <a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_volume_management"  target="_blank">volume manager</a> (thanks to the antiquated HFS+), and it looks like <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/02/19/xserve-raid-discontinued/"  target="_blank">the company EOLed their Fibre Channel RAID product, Xserve RAID, today</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-149"></span>Let&#8217;s start with today&#8217;s good news. Apple updated Xsan with broader support for third-party Fibre Channel hardware, making a good product better.  Although it requires Leopard, Xsan 2 now allows a single Mac to access multiple SAN devices, improving performance and flexibility.  Geared towards the company&#8217;s primary professional customer base, Xsan lets a large number of Mac machines share Fibre Channel-connected volumes and file systems.</p>
<p>Now the bad news.  I&#8217;ve long loved Apple&#8217;s simple Xserve RAID for the same reason I loved my old iPod &#8211; it was simple, lacking about half the features of my half-decade-old Nomad Jukebox, but so easy to use that I actually, you know, <em>used</em> it!  The Xserve RAID was severely limited by comparison to every other enterprise storage array.  No snapshots, thin provisioning, tiered storage, deduplication, etc, etc&#8230; But it <em>worked</em>.  And that was plenty for the company&#8217;s core user base, especially if they were using it with Xsan, as probably 90% were.   Before Microsoft coined &#8220;simple SAN&#8221;, Apple delivered it.</p>
<p>But no more.  Now, the company redirects visitors to <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.apple.com/xserve/raid"  target="_blank">the old Xserve RAID URL</a> to <a href="http://www.promise.com/apple/"  target="_blank">Promise&#8217;s web site, and their decent VTrak E-Class RAID system</a>. This Fibre Channel RAID array is up to date with 4 Gb interfaces, SATA, and SAS, and, although basic, is not as stripped down as the old Apple product.  But I&#8217;ll miss it.  I especially loved the nifty LED activity bar graphs, the identifier buttons, and the Appley goodness of the industrial design.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong>  Yup, everyone is noticing the change now!</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/19/xserve-raid-no-longer-available-apple-partners-with-promise/"  target="_blank">TUAW: XServe Raid no longer available, Apple partners with Promise</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/apple_outsources_its_server_storage_to_promise_technologies"  target="_blank">Computerworld: Apple outsources its server storage to Promise Technologies</a></li>
<li><a href="http://storagemojo.com/2008/02/19/apples-xserve-raid-bites-the-dust/"  target="_blank">StorageMojo: Apple&#8217;s Xserve RAID bites the dust</a></li>
</ul>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/02/20/apple-customers-vent-over-ex-xserve-raid/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Apple Customers Vent Over Ex-Xserve RAID</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/04/21/promise-pegasus-thunderbolt-preview/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Promise Pegasus Thunderbolt Preview</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/06/06/storage-features-mac-os-107-lion/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Key Storage Features in Mac OS X 10.7 &#8220;Lion&#8221;</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/12/emulated-fibre-channel-virtualization/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Of Emulated Fibre Channel, Virtualization, And The Right Tool For The Job</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/10/20/mac-mini-server/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Mac Mini: Apple&#8217;s Inexpensive Server</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/02/19/apple-revs-xsan-and-kills-xserve-raid/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2008. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/02/19/apple-revs-xsan-and-kills-xserve-raid/">Apple Revs Xsan and Kills Xserve RAID?</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/apple/" title="View all posts in Apple" rel="category tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/02/19/apple-revs-xsan-and-kills-xserve-raid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

