<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat &#187; RDM Archives  &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/tag/rdm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
			<item>
		<title>Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 4</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/03/31/storage-vmware-esx-35-update-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/03/31/storage-vmware-esx-35-update-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gestalt IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3PAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[82598]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AHCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emulex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICH10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICH7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICH9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LUN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MegaRAID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetXtreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PXE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Array]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SnapDrive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StorageTek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=1666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like clockwork, VMware has cranked out another update to their flagship enterprise product, ESX 3.5. The last update came out in early November, 2008, and included some major new functionality. What&#8217;s in store this time to intrigue storage folks? Not much. For more information on earlier updates, see my articles: Storage Fixes in VMware ESX [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like clockwork, VMware has cranked out another update to their flagship enterprise product, ESX 3.5. <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/11/07/storage-vmware-esx-update-3/"  target="_self">The last update</a> came out in early November, 2008, and included some major new functionality. What&#8217;s in store this time to intrigue storage folks? Not much.</p>
<blockquote><p>For more information on earlier updates, see my articles:</p>
<ul>
<li><em><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/"  target="_self">Storage Fixes in VMware ESX Server 3.5 Update 2</a></em></li>
<li><em><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/11/07/storage-vmware-esx-update-3/"  target="_blank">Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 3</a></em></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><span id="more-1666"></span></p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Expanded Support for Enhanced vmxnet Adapter</h3>
<p>Not specifically a storage change, but the enhanced vmxnet adapter introduced back in the original release of ESX 3.5 now works with most versions of Windows Server 2003 and XP Pro. Look for improved performance when using guest-side SMB and NFS as well as the guest iSCSI initiator. Note that you cannot select this driver when configuring non-Enterprise Edition machines; <a href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&amp;cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=1007195"  target="_blank">you have to select Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition (64-bit) regardless of which version of Server 2003 you are using</a>.</p>
<ul>
</ul>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Expanded SAS and SATA Controller Support</h3>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to install ESX on a server equipped with a PMC 8011, Intel ICH9 or ICH10, CERC 6/I SATA/SAS Integrated RAID Controller, or HP Smart Array P700m Controller, you&#8217;ll find happiness in Update 4.</p>
<p>The Intel controllers are especially important, as we&#8217;re seeing them used more and more and this driver is more full-featured than the earlier Broadcom HT 1000 and Intel ICH7 drivers. The Intel ICH9/ICH10 is a dual-mode (IDE/ATA and AHCI/SATA) driver, supports SATA hard drives, SSDs, and optical drives, and now <strong>enables VMFS support when in AHCI/SATA mode</strong>. It&#8217;s not clear whether VMware actually supports VMFS datastores on ICH9/10 SATA, but it says it works. Anyone want to try it out? One thing is certain: You can&#8217;t use SATA drives in a shared/clustered environment because SATA does not include reservations. See <a href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&amp;cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=1008673"  target="_blank">this tech note</a> and especially this question:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Earlier, it was mentioned that we can create VMFS if we use AHCI/SATA mode. If so, why did VMware not claim VMFS support when using SATA controller running in AHCI/SATA mode?</em></p>
<p>VMware might decide to add support in the near future. There is no strong need to have VMFS support on a SATA drive, because native SATA protocol does not support reserve/release. Reserve/release is needed if VMFS is used as clustered file system in a shared disk environment.</p>
</blockquote>
<h3 class="post-subhead">PXE Boot Support</h3>
<p>Rich at VM/ETC points out that <a href="http://vmetc.com/2009/03/30/esxesxi-35-update-4-released-pxe-boot-esxi-experimentally-supported/"  target="_blank">Update 4 includes experimental PXE boot support</a> for ESX and ESXi. As he notes, this has major implications for cloud computing platforms, since it means that ESX servers can boot guests without local storage at all. Very interesting! Let&#8217;s bet that Update 5 (expected in June or July) will include this as a supported option.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Updated QLogic, Emulex, and LSI Drivers</h3>
<p>Like most ESX updates, this one included updated Fibre Channel drivers.</p>
<ul>
<li>The QLogic Fibre Channel Adapter driver and firmware (versions 7.08-vm66 and 4.04.06, respectively) include bug fixes and enhanced NPIV support.</li>
<li>On the Emulex side, driver version 7.4.0.40 supports the company&#8217;s HBAnyware 4.0 management software.</li>
<li>Users of SAS and SCSI LSI MegaRAIDs will find driver version 3.19vmw (megaraid_sas) and 2.6.48.18 vmw (mptscsi) which improves performance and enhances event handling capabilities.</li>
</ul>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Expanded Sun Storage Array Support</h3>
<p>All you StorageTek loyalists out there will be happy to see support for Sun&#8217;s low-end <a href="http://www.sun.com/storage/disk_systems/workgroup/2530/"  target="_blank">StorageTek 2530 SAS array</a> as well as the modular <a href="http://www.sun.com/storage/disk_systems/midrange/6580/"  target="_blank">6580</a> and <a href="http://www.sun.com/storage/disk_systems/midrange/6780/"  target="_blank">6780</a> Fibre Channel arrays. It looks like just about every model in Sun&#8217;s current storage lineup is now supported in ESX.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Expanded Network Card Support</h3>
<p>Support for Gigabit cards is greatly expanded, including HP&#8217;s quad-port NC375i and dual-port NC362i and NC360m, Intel&#8217;s Gigabit CT and 82574L, and NetXtreme&#8217;s BCM5722, BCM5755, BCM5755M, and BCM5756. Intel&#8217;s widely-used 10-gig <a href="http://developer.intel.com/design/network/products/lan/controllers/82598.htm"  target="_blank">82598EB</a> cards are now supported as well.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Tweaks and Fixes</h3>
<p>Looking through the release notes, a few storage-related tweaks and fixes stand out:</p>
<ol>
<li>WMware can optionally automatically throttle back the queue depth when congestion is encountered. See <a href="http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1008113" >Controlling LUN queue depth throttling in VMware ESX for 3PAR Storage Arrays</a> for more information.</li>
<li>VMklinux module heap size can now be adjusted as LUN queue-depth values are increased. Since tuning LUN queue depths is one common trick of the storage trade to improve performance, especially in queue-stingy systems like ESX, this is welcome news. But call VMware support before you monkey with it!</li>
<li>An RDM-related issue where SCSI inquiry data over 36 bytes was truncated or corrupted (for example when using Microsoft VSS and NetApp SnapDrive) has been resolved.</li>
</ol>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s all folks. I suggest you all <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/vi3/doc/vi3_esx35u4_rel_notes.html"  target="_blank">read the release notes</a> for yourself, and please leave a comment if you see an error in what I wrote here or have something to add!</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/11/07/storage-vmware-esx-update-3/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 3</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Fixes in VMware ESX Server 3.5 Update 2</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/30/qlogic-emulex-deliver-8-gb-fibre-channel-vmware-esx/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">QLogic and Emulex Deliver 8 Gb Fibre Channel For VMware ESX</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/27/vmware-esx-sata-pata-compatibility-cheat-sheet/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">VMware ESX SATA and PATA Compatibility Cheat Sheet</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Changes in the VMware vSphere 4 Family</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/03/31/storage-vmware-esx-35-update-4/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2009. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/03/31/storage-vmware-esx-35-update-4/">Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 4</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/gestaltit/" title="View all posts in Gestalt IT" rel="category tag">Gestalt IT</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/virtualstorage/" title="View all posts in Virtual Storage" rel="category tag">Virtual Storage</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/03/31/storage-vmware-esx-35-update-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xen 3.3 Update Brings Paravirtualized SCSI</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/08/28/xen-33-update-paravirtualized-scsi/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/08/28/xen-33-update-paravirtualized-scsi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fibre Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PVSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the new features in Xen 3.3, released this week, caught my eye: Paravirtualized SCSI (PVSCSI), which allows a guest OS to directly interact with a SCSI (or Fibre Channel) HBA. This should allow more specialized applications to be virtualized in Xen environments that use SCSI or FC storage without requiring the addition of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the <a href="http://www.xen.org/download/"  target="_blank">new features in Xen 3.3</a>, released this week, caught my eye: Paravirtualized SCSI (PVSCSI), which allows a guest OS to directly interact with a SCSI (or Fibre Channel) HBA. This should allow more specialized applications to be virtualized in Xen environments that use SCSI or FC storage without requiring the addition of a dedicated physical storage port per guest.</p>
<p> </p>
<div id="attachment_496" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;"><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-51.png" ><img class="size-medium wp-image-496" title="Xen PVSCSI and NPIV " src="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-51-300x143.png" alt="PVSCSI gives virtual machines direct access to SCSI and FC HBAs, and plays nicely with NPIV (Xensummit diagram by Fujitsu)" width="300" height="143" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">PVSCSI gives virtual machines direct access to SCSI and FC HBAs, and plays nicely with NPIV (Xensummit diagram by Fujitsu)</p></div>
<p>Functionally similar to VMware&#8217;s Physical Compatibility Mode for Raw Device Mode (RDM) volumes, PVSCSI enables certain applications that require direct SCSI communication to function in a virtual environment. Examples include Oracle RMAN, backup applications, and potentially SAN management software.</p>
<p>PVSCSI plays nicely with N_Port ID Virtualization (NPIV), too, so you don&#8217;t need to assign a physical HBA port to each guest &#8211; they can all share a port or two, and each would have his own N_Port on the Fibre Channel fabric.</p>
<p>In their <a href="http://www.xen.org/files/xensummit_fall07/19_Matsumoto.pdf"  target="_blank">Xensummit presentation about PVSCSI</a>, Fujitsu showed impressive performance numbers, demonstrating that the technology doesn&#8217;t cause much of a performance hit even though it is substantially more complicated than the alternative approaches. I do wonder how PVSCSI managed to outperform Dom0 with 128k writes, but let&#8217;s chalk that up to insignificant variations in timing&#8230;</p>
<p>Now if only Xen would update the (3.2-era) readme files on their download page!</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/13/storage-server-virtualization-numbers/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage for Server Virtualization: I Need Numbers</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/09/the-next-wave-of-virtualization/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Next Wave of Virtualization</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Fixes in VMware ESX Server 3.5 Update 2</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/03/31/storage-vmware-esx-35-update-4/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 4</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/02/07/pile-interesting-links-february-4-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, February 4, 2011</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/08/28/xen-33-update-paravirtualized-scsi/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2008. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/08/28/xen-33-update-paravirtualized-scsi/">Xen 3.3 Update Brings Paravirtualized SCSI</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/virtualstorage/" title="View all posts in Virtual Storage" rel="category tag">Virtual Storage</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/08/28/xen-33-update-paravirtualized-scsi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storage Fixes in VMware ESX Server 3.5 Update 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 gigabit Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8 gigabit Fibre Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emulex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fibre Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage VMotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume Shadow Copy Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware just released Update 2 for VMware ESX Server 3.5 (Virtual Infrastructure), and it includes some storage fixes of note: Support for Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) for filesystems Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008 guests.  This means VMware services like VCB and SRM can now signal Windows Server to quiesce filesystems before creating a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware just released <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/vi3/doc/vi3_esx35u2_vc25u2_rel_notes.html"  target="_blank">Update 2 for VMware ESX Server 3.5</a> (Virtual Infrastructure), and it includes some storage fixes of note:</p>
<ol>
<li>Support for <a rel="nofollow" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa384649(VS.85).aspx"  target="_blank">Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS)</a> for filesystems Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008 guests.  This means VMware services like VCB and SRM can now signal Windows Server to quiesce filesystems before creating a clone or snapshot and is a <strong>major addition</strong>!</li>
<li>Windows Server 2003 guests also get <em>application</em> quiescing, where supported.</li>
<li>You can now extend a live, running VMFS volume as storage is added, just like Windows Vista and 2008 guests could already do with raw device mode (RDM).  Note that this only works for flat disks with no persistent snapshots open.</li>
</ol>
<p><span id="more-364"></span><br />
A few items are now officially supported, too:</p>
<ol>
<li>Support for Storage VMotion between and among Fibre Channel and iSCSI datastores is here, and in Update 1.</li>
<li>iSCSI over 10 gigabit Ethernet (10 GbE) is now supported allegedly, though the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vi35_io_guide.pdf"  target="_blank">I/O Compatibility Guide</a> still says &#8220;Gigabit only&#8221;.  Of course, it already worked, but it&#8217;s nice to have official support just the same&#8230;  Bring on the datacenter Ethernet!  They&#8217;ll support this in Update 1 too.</li>
<li>And NFS over 10 GbE is supported, too!</li>
</ol>
<div>And some more hardware support, though I had a hard time reconciling the guides with the release notes&#8230;</div>
<ol>
<li>They supposedly added support for 8 gigabit Fibre Channel (8 Gb FC) HBAs, but I don&#8217;t see it in the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vi35_io_guide.pdf"  target="_blank">I/O Compatibility Guide</a>. The Emulex <a href="http://www.emulex.com/products/hba/e12000/ds.jsp"  target="_blank">LP12000</a>/LP12002 are noted as 4 Gb only, the QLogic <a href="http://www.qlogic.com/Products/SAN_products_FCHBA_QLE2560.aspx"  target="_blank">QLE2560</a>/QLE2562 aren&#8217;t listed, the HP <a rel="nofollow" href="http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storageworks/fc81q_pci/index.html"  target="_blank">81/82 series</a> isn&#8217;t there either.  <strong>Update:</strong>  <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/30/qlogic-and-emulex-deliver-8-gb-fibre-channel-for-vmware-esx/"  target="_self">QLogic and Emulex HBAs are supported after all!</a></li>
<li>Support for more Serial-Attached SCSI (SAS), including Dell SAS 5/E, LSI 1078, Sun SG‐XPCIESAS‐R‐EXT‐Z, and HP SC08GE is listed in the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vi35_san_guide.pdf"  target="_blank">Stotage Compatibility Guide</a>.</li>
<li>CIM system health monitoring of some QLogic and Emulex HBAs is new too.</li>
</ol>
<p>[ad#banner]</p>
<p>See also:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/slowe/content/feed/~3/346978895/"  target="_blank">Scott Lowe&#8217;s (as always) excellent overview</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vmetc.com/2008/07/26/esx-35-update-2-released-with-new-fixes-and-new-features/"  target="_blank">VM /ETC&#8217;s colorful post</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/07/26/esx-35-update-2-available-now/"  target="_blank">Excellent coverage at Yellow Bricks</a></li>
</ul>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/30/qlogic-emulex-deliver-8-gb-fibre-channel-vmware-esx/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">QLogic and Emulex Deliver 8 Gb Fibre Channel For VMware ESX</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/11/07/storage-vmware-esx-update-3/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 3</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/03/31/storage-vmware-esx-35-update-4/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 4</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/08/08/emulex-and-qlogic-learn-to-speak-klingon/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Emulex and QLogic Learn to Speak Klingon!</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/24/vmware-esx-fcoe-cna-compatibility-plain-english/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">VMware ESX FCoE CNA Compatibility in Plain English</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2008. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/">Storage Fixes in VMware ESX Server 3.5 Update 2</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/virtualstorage/" title="View all posts in Virtual Storage" rel="category tag">Virtual Storage</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

