<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat &#187; PVSCSI Archives  &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/tag/pvscsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
			<item>
		<title>Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, February 4, 2011</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/02/07/pile-interesting-links-february-4-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/02/07/pile-interesting-links-february-4-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terabyte home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Popescu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew von Nagy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Evans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCoTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Ferro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.264]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Gaddis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La Crosse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Simmons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photosmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PVSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silvano Gai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Gallagher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Long]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Field Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unified storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W. Curtis Preston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xangati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xiotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=4859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent last week tying up loose ends before Tech Field Day 5 in San Jose. It's going to be a great event, with presentations by Symantec, Drobo, Xangati, NetEx, InfoBlox, HP, and a new company making their US launch! In the mean time, I am working hard to wrap up the Small Enterprise Storage Array Buyers' Guide for DCIG and continuing my regular work - spreading the word about state of the art IT! I've been researching VMware extensively, and building a home lab server, in preparation for my Storage for Virtual Servers seminar, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent last week tying up loose ends before <a href="http://gestaltit.com/field-day/tfd5/"  target="_blank">Tech Field Day 5</a> in San Jose. It&#8217;s going to be a great event, with presentations by Symantec, Drobo, Xangati, NetEx, InfoBlox, HP, and a new company making their US launch! In the mean time, I am working hard to wrap up the Small Enterprise Storage Array Buyers&#8217; Guide for <a href="http://www.dcig.com/free-dcig-downloads.html"  target="_blank">DCIG</a> and continuing my regular work &#8211; spreading the word about state of the art IT! I&#8217;ve been researching VMware extensively, and building a home lab server, in preparation for my <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/12/open-source-2011-storage-virtualization-seminar/"  target="_blank">Storage for Virtual Servers seminar</a>, too.</p>
<ul class="scrd_digest">
<li>My writing
<ul>
<li>First up, a battery charger? <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/02/03/la-crosse-bc-700-battery-charger-review/" >La Crosse BC-700 Review: A Battery Charger That Does Not Suck</a></li>
<li>I urge you to <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/31/curtis-prestons-backup-central-live/" >See W. Curtis Preston’s Backup Central Live!</a></li>
<li>I was looking for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/31/best-nic-network-card-vmware-esx-home-lab-machine-retail/" >The Best Network Card For VMware ESX Home Lab Machines</a></li>
<li>From my Network Computing blog: <a href="http://www.networkcomputing.com/storage-networking-management/unified-storage-what-is-it-good-for.php" rel="external" >Unified Storage: What Is It Good For?</a></li>
<li>I was amazed to see the result of my <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/series/hp-airprint/"  target="_blank">HP Photosmart printer series</a>: <a href="http://foskettservices.com/2011/02/the-power-of-negative-publicity/" >The Power of Negative Publicity</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Other great links
<ul>
<li>Chris Evans wrote a solid piece for Datamation: <a href="http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/features/article.php/12297_3915946_1/Virtualization-and-Storage-Overview-Vendor-Solutions.htm" rel="external" >Virtualization and Storage: Overview, Vendor Solutions</a></li>
<li>Matt Simmons talks about dealing with storage: <a href="http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/2011/02/im-here-to-shard-data-and-chew-bubblegum/" >I’m here to shard data and chew bubblegum…</a></li>
<li>Alex Popescu&#8217;s <a href="http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/2981240390/5-approaches-to-scalable-storage-solutions" >5 Approaches to Scalable Storage Solutions</a> led to Jeff Darcy&#8217;s <a href="http://pl.atyp.us/wordpress/?p=3184" rel="external" >Introduction to Distributed Filesystems</a></li>
<li>Xangati talks Field Day: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://xangati.typepad.com/xangati/2011/02/running-comprehensive-and-deep-at-tech-field-day-5.html" rel="external" >Running Comprehensive and Deep at Tech Field Day #5</a></li>
<li>And then there&#8217;s Wireless Field Day, courtesy of Andrew von Nagy: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://revolutionwifi.blogspot.com/2011/01/shamrockin-wireless-industry.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+RevolutionWi-fi+(Revolution+Wi-Fi)" rel="external" >Shamrockin&#8217; the Wireless Industry</a></li>
<li>Greg Ferro continues spreading the word on FCoTR: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/etherealmind/~3/oVh8arMgiSM/" rel="external" >Presenting Silvano Gai With FCoTR Button</a></li>
<li>Howard Marks takes up the topic of specialized hard disk drives: <a href="http://www.networkcomputing.com/tapes-and-disks/yes-virginia-raid-drives-are-different.php" rel="external" >Yes, Virginia, RAID Drives Are Different</a></li>
<li>Howard was spurred by Simon Gallagher, among others: <a href="http://vinf.net/2011/01/31/home-labbers-beware-of-using-western-digital-sata-hdds-with-a-raid-controller/" rel="external" >Home Labbers beware of using Western Digital SATA HDDs with a RAID Controller</a></li>
<li>The continuing saga of Google Chrome and H.264 takes a weird turn: <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/microsoft-adds-h264-support-to-google-chrome/2937" rel="external" >Microsoft adds H.264 support to Google Chrome</a></li>
<li>Simon Long fights the good fight, presenting solid technical info: <a href="http://www.simonlong.co.uk/blog/2011/02/01/vmware-view-desktops-ide-or-scsi-buslogic-lsi-logic-or-pvscsi/" rel="external" >VMware View Desktops: IDE or SCSI? BusLogic, LSI Logic or PVSCSI?</a></li>
<li>A key topic in storage is the balance between performance and capacity, as noted by Xiotech: <a href="http://blog.xiotech.com/blog/?p=460" rel="external" >Performance and Capacity Tradeoffs and the Rise of a New Class of Storage</a></li>
<li>An amusing infographic: <a href="http://pleated-jeans.com/2011/01/24/the-united-states-of-shame-chart/" rel="external" >The United States of Shame (CHART)</a></li>
<li>Kevin Houston takes on Cisco UCS: <a href="http://bladesmadesimple.com/2011/01/what-cisco-has-to-do-to-win-the-blade-server-market/" rel="external" >What Cisco Has to Do to Win the Blade Server Market</a></li>
<li>Finally, Jeremy Gaddis is back with <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/evilrouters/~3/qxEllJzMbII/" rel="external" >Bypassing the Internet Kill Switch</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Subscribe to <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/sfoskett" rel="me"  target="_blank">my Google Reader feed</a> or <a href="http://twitter.com/sfoskett" rel="me"  target="_blank">follow me on Twitter</a> to see these in real-time.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/02/11/pile-interesting-links-february-11-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, February 11, 2011</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/03/25/pile-interesting-links-march-25-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, March 25, 2011</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/02/22/pile-interesting-links-february-18-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, February 18, 2011</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/17/pile-interesting-links-january-14-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, January 14, 2011</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/03/18/pile-interesting-links-march-18-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, March 18, 2011</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/02/07/pile-interesting-links-february-4-2011/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2011. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/02/07/pile-interesting-links-february-4-2011/">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, February 4, 2011</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/personal/" title="View all posts in Personal" rel="category tag">Personal</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/terabytehome/" title="View all posts in Terabyte home" rel="category tag">Terabyte home</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/virtualstorage/" title="View all posts in Virtual Storage" rel="category tag">Virtual Storage</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/02/07/pile-interesting-links-february-4-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storage Changes in the VMware vSphere 4 Family</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gestalt IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPath/VE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PVSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SATP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage VMotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin provisioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMDirectPath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=1775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware officially launched their next-generation (version 4) enterprise family of products today under the "vSphere 4" name. As I've been doing for the last few major ESX releases, I'm focusing this post on the storage changes present in vSphere 4.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware officially <a href="http://www.vmware.com/landing_pages/nextgen.html"  target="_blank">launched</a> their next-generation (version 4) enterprise family of products today under the &#8220;vSphere 4&#8243; name. As I&#8217;ve been doing for the last few major ESX releases, I&#8217;m focusing this post on the storage changes present in vSphere 4.</p>
<blockquote><p>For more information on earlier updates, see my articles:</p>
<ul>
<li><em><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/"  target="_self">Storage Fixes in VMware ESX Server 3.5 Update 2</a></em></li>
<li><em><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/11/07/storage-vmware-esx-update-3/"  target="_blank">Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 3</a></em></li>
<li><em><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/03/31/storage-vmware-esx-35-update-4/" >Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 4</a><br />
 </em></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>One first step is VMware&#8217;s whitepaper, &#8220;<a href="http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/VMW_09Q1_WP_vSphereStorage_P10_R1.pdf"  target="_blank">What&#8217;s New in VMware vSphere 4: Storage</a>&#8220;.<span id="more-1775"></span></p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Licensing and Availability of Features</h3>
<p>The most important change at a glance is in the licensing model for VMware.</p>
<ul>
<li>A new low-end &#8220;standard&#8221; level includes all of the components a small business might need, including thin provisioning of storage, at a very attractive price.</li>
<li>The &#8220;advanced&#8221; level includes advances in the area of data protection.</li>
<li>At the &#8220;enterprise&#8221; level, live migration of storage is enabled.</li>
<li>Top of the heap is &#8220;enterprise plus&#8221;, which enables the intriguing plug-in third-party multipathing support previously rumored.</li>
<li>Enterprise customers with current support will get vStorage thin provisioning and data protection when they upgrade.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_1777" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 529px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;"><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/vspher4.jpg" ><img class="size-full wp-image-1777" title="vspher4" src="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/vspher4.jpg" alt="Each step up the licensing ladder enables important new storage features" width="519" height="444" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">Each step up the licensing ladder enables important new storage features (source: VMware)</p></div>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Thin Provisioning</h3>
<p>One of the most widespread storage features is native thin provisioning. VMware <strong>ESX 4 will allocate storage in 1 MB chunks</strong> as capacity is used. This isn&#8217;t really completely new &#8211; similar support was enabled by default for virtual disks on NFS in VI 3, and thin provisioning could be enabled on the command line for block-based storage as well. It was also present in VMware&#8217;s desktop products, including my own copy of Fusion. And <strong>ESX allows thick-to-thin conversion</strong> during Storage VMotion.</p>
<p>The difference with vSphere 4 is that thin provisioning is fully supported and integrated into every version of ESX. Although <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/tag/thin-provisioning"  target="_blank">many storage arrays now also offer thin storage</a>, the addition of native, integrated thin provisioning right in ESX is huge. This alone will be a major capacity (and thus, cost) savings feature! VMware claims 50% storage savings in their lab tests.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Dynamic Expansion of VMFS Volumes</h3>
<p>VMFS volumes can now grow (and, in some cases, shrink) online without resorting to spanning to a new LUN. Under vSphere 4, VMFS volumes can grow to take advantage of expanded LUNs (up to 2 TB per LUN). The old method still works as well, and multi-LUN spanned VMFS volumes can grow when any of their LUNs is expanded.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Enhanced Storage VMotion</h3>
<p>Like thin provisioning, Storage VMotion has been elevated to first-class status, supported just about everywhere you&#8217;d want it. It&#8217;s in all the likely spots within vCenter.</p>
<p>Storage VMotion gives serious storage flexibility now, enabling (almost) any-to-any migration of VMFS volumes: Pick up a Fibre Channel, iSCSI, or NFS disk image and move it to another datastore running any of those protocols to convert live. And you can do thick-to-thin provisioning at the same time.</p>
<p>Under the hood, the whole infrastructure has been revised. Storage VMotion leverages VMware&#8217;s change block tracking instead of disk snapshots now, speeding up the migration process and reducing the (formerly excessive) memory and CPU requirements of Storage VMotion in 3.5. This is the same technology leveraged by vSphere&#8217;s High Availability features, by the way.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Pluggable Storage Architecture (PSA)</h3>
<p>Only &#8220;Enterprise Plus&#8221; licensees will get to use it, but the vSphere family also sports a new <a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/03/19/pluggable-storage-architecture-exploring-the-next-version-of-esxvcenter/"  target="_blank">pluggable storage architecture (PSA)</a> which will initially be leveraged to deliver vendor-specific multipath support. Note that the native multipath support in vSphere continues to be a basic round-robin or fail-over system &#8211; it will not dynamically load balance I/O across multiple paths or make more intelligent decisions about which paths to use.</p>
<div id="attachment_1779" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 518px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;"><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-1.png" ><img class="size-full wp-image-1779" title="picture-1" src="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-1.png" alt="vSphere 4's Pluggable Storage Architecture allows third-party developers to replace ESX's storage I/O stack" width="508" height="224" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">vSphere 4&#39;s Pluggable Storage Architecture allows third-party developers to replace ESX&#39;s storage I/O stack (source: VMware)</p></div>
<p>As you may gather from this VMware illustration (but would probably miss since it&#8217;s not all that comprehensible), there are two classes of third-party plug-ins:</p>
<ol>
<li>Basic path-selection plugins (PSPs) will merely optimize the choice of which path to use, ideal for active/passive type arrays</li>
<li>Full storage array type plugins (SATPs) will allow load balancing across multiple paths in addition to path selection for active/active arrays</li>
</ol>
<p>EMC also announced <strong><a href="http://chucksblog.emc.com/chucks_blog/2009/04/vsphere-as-an-io-engine.html"  target="_blank">PowerPath/VE</a></strong><a href="http://chucksblog.emc.com/chucks_blog/2009/04/vsphere-as-an-io-engine.html"  target="_blank"> for vSphere</a>, integrating their popular multi-platform path management software directly into ESX. It&#8217;s not clear at this point whether PowerPath will require an Enterprise Plus license (or if it will come with one) or if it will work with all editions, but I&#8217;m sure that will be clarified soon. My EMC contacts do tell me that PowerPath/VE is licensed on a per-socket basis (like VMware of yore) and that EMC sales reps have some room to get creative on licensing.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">iSCSI Software Initiator Enhancements</h3>
<p>It&#8217;s harder to claim it as a new feature, but the iSCSI software initiator has also been tweaked and tuned to use less CPU time and deliver better throughput. The iSCSI configuration process has also been smoothed out so one no longer needs to have a live Service Console connection in order to communicate with an iSCSI target. And changes made in the general tab are now global, so they&#8217;ll propagate down to each target. Bi-directional CHAP is also added, so the target can now be authenticated in addition to the initiator.</p>
<p>vSphere also includes a paravirtualized iSCSI driver (PVSCSI) which works like vmxnet to present a higher-performance iSCSI adapter within certain supported guest OSes.</p>
<p>More information on multipathing iSCSI can be found at <a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/03/18/iscsi-multipathing-with-esxcliexploring-the-next-version-of-esx/"  target="_blank">Yellow Bricks</a> and in Chad Sakac&#8217;s <a rel="nofollow" href="http://virtualgeek.typepad.com/virtual_geek/2009/01/a-multivendor-post-to-help-our-mutual-iscsi-customers-using-vmware.html"  target="_blank">mega-post</a> on the topic.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">High-Performance I/O</h3>
<p>vSphere really pours on the I/O power. They claim a 3x increase, to &#8220;over 300,000 I/O operations per second&#8221;, but mentioned in the launch that they&#8217;ve gotten to 400,000 in some workloads. This is really amazing, and if it&#8217;s true in real-world use means that VMware ESX can now host just about any application you can think of.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny, but just a few weeks before the announcement VMware&#8217;s Chief Data Center architect, Scott Davis, told me at Storage Networking World that vSphere would double I/O performance. I thought this was a bold statement at the time, but VMware went further in their official documents, claiming 3x improvement. Now we have an on-stage admission that it could be up to 4x! This is serious stuff, folks: <strong>Can VMware really do 400,000 IOPS</strong>?</p>
<p>One question is whether these IOPS improvements require the new VMDirectPath I/O for Storage, which binds a physical Fibre Channel HBA to a single guest OS, or if they&#8217;re generalized across all systems.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">vCenter Improvements</h3>
<p>vCenter now includes <a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/04/20/storage-views-exploring-the-next-version-of/"  target="_blank">more storage information</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li>Each VM and ESX in the inventory has a tab showing storage information and allowing users to set alarms on storage use &#8211; setting capacity alarms becomes extremely important when thin provisioning is used!</li>
<li>vCenter inventory has a view showing datastore details</li>
<li>There&#8217;s also a nice storage topology map</li>
</ul>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Data Protection APIs (Updated)</h3>
<p>VMware also enhanced the APIs for consolidated backup (VCB) into &#8220;vStorage Data Protection&#8221;. <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Available only with Advanced or Enterprise licenses</span>, these APIs allow enterprise backup vendors to develop specific integration with VMware without VCB in the middle.  All versions of ESX include this vStorage API and boast VCB support. Standard and Essentials licenses do not include vCenter Data Recovery, a standalone disk-to-disk backup capability for virtual machines.</p>
<h3 class="post-subhead">Conclusion</h3>
<p>vSphere is loaded with storage improvements, though many seem like incremental updates rather than new features. Admins will welcome thin provisioning support, and the full integration of Storage VMotion is certainly welcome, but I think the changes to vCenter will be most noticeable. I&#8217;ll be looking into EMC&#8217;s PowerPath/VE and the amazing I/O improvements as we move forward and learn more about the next ESX!</p>
<p>Duncan Epping posted much more <a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/04/21/vsphere-linkage/" >vSphere Linkage</a> on his Yellow Bricks blog if you&#8217;re interested in non-storage features. I also suggest reading Chris Evans&#8217; outline of <a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/04/21/enterprise-computing-vmware-announce-vsphere-4/"  target="_blank">vSphere storage changes</a>.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/07/16/vmware-vsphere-5-storage/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Changes in VMware vSphere 5</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/06/06/vmware-esx-vsphere-satp-psp-support-matrix/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">VMware PSP and SATP in Plain English</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/22/emc-powerpath-vmware-hyperv/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">PowerPath To The Virtual People</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/11/11/vmware-vasa/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">What is VMware VASA? Not Much (Yet)</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/01/26/essential-vmware-esx-iscsi/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Essential Reading for VMware ESX iSCSI Users!</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2009. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/">Storage Changes in the VMware vSphere 4 Family</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/gestaltit/" title="View all posts in Gestalt IT" rel="category tag">Gestalt IT</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/virtualstorage/" title="View all posts in Virtual Storage" rel="category tag">Virtual Storage</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/21/storage-vmware-vsphere-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xen 3.3 Update Brings Paravirtualized SCSI</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/08/28/xen-33-update-paravirtualized-scsi/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/08/28/xen-33-update-paravirtualized-scsi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fibre Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PVSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the new features in Xen 3.3, released this week, caught my eye: Paravirtualized SCSI (PVSCSI), which allows a guest OS to directly interact with a SCSI (or Fibre Channel) HBA. This should allow more specialized applications to be virtualized in Xen environments that use SCSI or FC storage without requiring the addition of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the <a href="http://www.xen.org/download/"  target="_blank">new features in Xen 3.3</a>, released this week, caught my eye: Paravirtualized SCSI (PVSCSI), which allows a guest OS to directly interact with a SCSI (or Fibre Channel) HBA. This should allow more specialized applications to be virtualized in Xen environments that use SCSI or FC storage without requiring the addition of a dedicated physical storage port per guest.</p>
<p> </p>
<div id="attachment_496" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;"><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-51.png" ><img class="size-medium wp-image-496" title="Xen PVSCSI and NPIV " src="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-51-300x143.png" alt="PVSCSI gives virtual machines direct access to SCSI and FC HBAs, and plays nicely with NPIV (Xensummit diagram by Fujitsu)" width="300" height="143" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">PVSCSI gives virtual machines direct access to SCSI and FC HBAs, and plays nicely with NPIV (Xensummit diagram by Fujitsu)</p></div>
<p>Functionally similar to VMware&#8217;s Physical Compatibility Mode for Raw Device Mode (RDM) volumes, PVSCSI enables certain applications that require direct SCSI communication to function in a virtual environment. Examples include Oracle RMAN, backup applications, and potentially SAN management software.</p>
<p>PVSCSI plays nicely with N_Port ID Virtualization (NPIV), too, so you don&#8217;t need to assign a physical HBA port to each guest &#8211; they can all share a port or two, and each would have his own N_Port on the Fibre Channel fabric.</p>
<p>In their <a href="http://www.xen.org/files/xensummit_fall07/19_Matsumoto.pdf"  target="_blank">Xensummit presentation about PVSCSI</a>, Fujitsu showed impressive performance numbers, demonstrating that the technology doesn&#8217;t cause much of a performance hit even though it is substantially more complicated than the alternative approaches. I do wonder how PVSCSI managed to outperform Dom0 with 128k writes, but let&#8217;s chalk that up to insignificant variations in timing&#8230;</p>
<p>Now if only Xen would update the (3.2-era) readme files on their download page!</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/01/13/storage-server-virtualization-numbers/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage for Server Virtualization: I Need Numbers</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/09/the-next-wave-of-virtualization/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Next Wave of Virtualization</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/07/28/storage-fixes-vmware-esx-server-35-update-2/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Fixes in VMware ESX Server 3.5 Update 2</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/03/31/storage-vmware-esx-35-update-4/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Storage Changes in VMware ESX 3.5 Update 4</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/02/07/pile-interesting-links-february-4-2011/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Back From the Pile: Interesting Links, February 4, 2011</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/08/28/xen-33-update-paravirtualized-scsi/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2008. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/08/28/xen-33-update-paravirtualized-scsi/">Xen 3.3 Update Brings Paravirtualized SCSI</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/virtualstorage/" title="View all posts in Virtual Storage" rel="category tag">Virtual Storage</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/08/28/xen-33-update-paravirtualized-scsi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

