<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat &#187; ProCurve Archives  &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/tag/procurve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
			<item>
		<title>Stephen&#8217;s HP Product Line Decoder Ring</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/09/29/hp-product-line-decoder-ring/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/09/29/hp-product-line-decoder-ring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3Com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3PAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brocade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compaq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H3C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitachi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ibrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LeftHand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProCurve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProStor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StorageWorks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=3751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HP has always been an alphabet soup company, assigning just about every item in their bewildering array of products a unique product number. Like Mercedes-Benz cars, even the product names are a mix of letters and numbers that can be off-putting to browsers. Now that they have grown to supersize proportions through internal expansion and acquisition, just about everyone outside the company seems to have trouble decoding the product line, so I decided to take a stab at decoding the enterprise lineup in plain english.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_3753" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;"><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Japanese-WWII-Enigma-Machine.jpg" ><img class="size-medium wp-image-3753" title="Japanese WWII Enigma Machine" src="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Japanese-WWII-Enigma-Machine-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">Do you want X-series or P-series storage? Is A-series networking gear any good? And where did all these HP products come from?</p></div>
<p>HP has always been an alphabet soup company, assigning just about every item in their bewildering array of products a unique product number. Like Mercedes-Benz cars, even the product names are a mix of letters and numbers that can be off-putting to browsers. Now that they have grown to supersize proportions through internal expansion and acquisition, just about everyone outside the company seems to have trouble decoding the product line, so I decided to take a stab at decoding the enterprise lineup in plain english.</p>
<h3>An Important Note</h3>
<p>This is not a political activity. I&#8217;m not trying to comment on which product is better than which or pigeonhole something by calling it &#8220;midrange&#8221; when HP thinks it&#8217;s &#8220;high-end&#8221;. I&#8217;m trying to be descriptive and helpful to prospective buyers working to understand the multitude of products sold by HP.</p>
<p>I welcome your input. In fact, I demand it! I don&#8217;t know which product is which and need your help to improve this list. Please feel free to comment and suggest corrections and additions (wireless?)</p>
<h3>Storage Products (&#8220;StorageWorks&#8221;)</h3>
<p>HP&#8217;s storage products are divided into three categories:</p>
<ul>
<li>P-series is block (SAN) storage using Fibre Channel or iSCSI</li>
<li>X-series is file (NAS) storage</li>
<li>Disk backup will presumably get a letter series in the future</li>
</ul>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Category</th>
<th>Product Line</th>
<th>Source</th>
<th>Type</th>
<th>In English</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="7">SAN<br />
(P-series)</td>
<td>StorageWorks P9500</td>
<td>Hitachi VSP</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>High-end enterprise SAN storage with mainframe support</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks XP2x000</td>
<td>Hitachi USP</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Enterprise SAN storage (formerly called XP)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3PAR T-Class</td>
<td>3PAR InServ T-Class</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>Mid-high enterprise SAN storage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3PAR F-Class</td>
<td>3PAR InServ F-Class</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>Midrange SAN storage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks EVA 4/6/8400</td>
<td>DEC/Compaq</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>Midrange SAN storage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks P4000</td>
<td>LeftHand</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>Midrange iSCSI storage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks P2000</td>
<td>Dot Hill</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Mainstream SAN storage, formerly called MSA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="6">NAS<br />
(X-series)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks X9000</td>
<td>Ibrix</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>Scale-out NAS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks X5000</td>
<td>PolyServe</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>Scale-out NAS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks 4400</td>
<td>PolyServe</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>Combination of PolyServe X5000 and EVA storage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks X1000/X3000</td>
<td>Microsoft software</td>
<td>OEM/HP</td>
<td>Midrange NAS using Microsoft Windows Storage Server software and HP hardware (X3000 is a gateway with WSS Enterprise Edition, X1000 includes more HP software)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks X300/X500</td>
<td>Microsoft software</td>
<td>OEM/HP</td>
<td>Entry-level NAS using ProLiant server hardware and Microsoft Windows Home Server software</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">Storage<br />
Networking</td>
<td>C-series</td>
<td>Cisco</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Multi-protocol (FC/iSCSI/FCIP) switching</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>B-series</td>
<td>Brocade</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Fibre Channel switching</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>H-series</td>
<td>Qlogic</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Midrange Fibre Channel switching</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5">Disk<br />
Backup</td>
<td>StorageWorks 12000 VLS</td>
<td>Sepaton</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>High-end enterprise virtual tape gateway with EVA storage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks 9000 VLS</td>
<td>Sepaton</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Midrange enterprise virtual tape library</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks D2D4000</td>
<td>StoreOnce</td>
<td>In-House</td>
<td>Midrange deduplication disk backup</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks D2D2000</td>
<td>StoreOnce</td>
<td>In-House</td>
<td>Mainstream deduplication disk backup</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks RDX</td>
<td>ProStor</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Removable disk backup system</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5">Tape<br />
Backup</td>
<td>StorageWorks ESL</td>
<td>Quantum</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>High-end tape library, with enhancements and drives from HP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks EML</td>
<td>Oracle (STK)</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Midrange tape library, significantly enhanced by HP and with HP drives</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks MSL6000</td>
<td>Overland</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Mid-size tape libraries</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks MSL2000/MSL8000</td>
<td>BDT</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Small- to mid-size tape libraries, significant HP design input</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>StorageWorks Autoloader</td>
<td>BDT</td>
<td>OEM</td>
<td>Small tape autoloaders</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Storage Product Notes</h4>
<p>HP engineering input into OEMed products ranges from minimal to substantial. The EML tape library, for example, is very different from the standard Oracle (STK) product on which it is based. The high-end Hitachi-based storage includes substantial HP input as well.</p>
<p>HP StorageWorks VP of Marketing Tom Joyce informed me that the 3PAR T- and F-Class boxes won&#8217;t be renamed at this point. This is probably a good move &#8211; capitalize on the value of the 3PAR name rather than the virtually-unknown &#8220;P-series&#8221; nomenclature.</p>
<p>Others tell me that the StorageWorks 4400 is hitting end-of-life in the now-ish timeframe. So it won&#8217;t get a new name either.</p>
<h3><strong>Networking Products</strong></h3>
<p>HP&#8217;s networking products are divided into three categories:</p>
<ul>
<li>A-series is enterprise-class core switching, routing, and 200+ AP wireless</li>
<li>E-series is mid-market and SMB switching and smaller wireless</li>
<li>V-series is SMB and SoHo web-managed and unmanaged switching and wireless</li>
</ul>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Category</th>
<th>Product Line</th>
<th>Source</th>
<th>Type</th>
<th>In English</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="6">Switching</td>
<td>A-series Modular</td>
<td>H3C</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>High-end datacenter switching</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>A6000 blade switch</td>
<td>ProCurve</td>
<td>In-House</td>
<td>Blade server switching</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>A-series Fixed</td>
<td>H3C</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>Fixed-port switching</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>E-series (except below)</td>
<td>ProCurve</td>
<td>In-House</td>
<td>SMB/midmarket networking</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>E4200/E4500/<br />
E4800/E5500</td>
<td>H3C</td>
<td>Acquired</td>
<td>Stackable and edge networking</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>V-series</td>
<td>ProCurve</td>
<td>In-House</td>
<td>SOHO/SMB networking</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">Routing</td>
<td>A-series</td>
<td>H3C</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>High-end routing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ProCurve A7000</td>
<td>ProCurve</td>
<td>In-House</td>
<td>SMB routing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">Wireless</td>
<td>A-series</td>
<td>H3C</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>High-end wireless</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>E-MSM</td>
<td>Colubris</td>
<td>Acquisition</td>
<td>Midrange wireless</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Networking Product Notes</h4>
<p>HP&#8217;s 3Com acquisition focused primarily on the H3C (former Huawei/3Com joint venture) high-end switching and routing products. Although some 3Com gear remains in the E-series line (particularly stackable switches), the low-end fixed-port switches have seemingly been eliminated from the product line. The Colubris acquisition provided HP with scalable wireless products now slotted below the H3C gear.</p>
<h3>Stephen&#8217;s Stance</h3>
<p>Product lines are always confusing at large companies, and doubly so where acquisitions bring in legacy products and customers. I wish HP the best of luck sorting all this out!</p>
<p>Note: The photo at the top is of a <a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enigma_machine#Enigma_derivatives"  target="_blank">Japanese clone</a> of the Enigma Machine from World War II.</p>
<p><em>Image credit: </em><em><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/radiorover/363751195/"  target="_blank">Japanese WWII Enigma Machine</a></em><em> by </em><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/radiorover/" ><em>Radio Rover</em></a></p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/10/07/ibm-storwize-v7000-svc/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">IBM&#8217;s Storwize V7000: 100% SVC; 0% Storwize</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/10/01/hp-tech-day/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Truth About HP&#8217;s Tech Day</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/08/16/dell-3par-enterprise-storage/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Dell + EqualLogic, Exanet, Ocarina, 3Par = What?</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/08/23/3par-bidding-war/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Everyone Loves 3Par &#8211; Here&#8217;s Why!</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/08/26/enterprise-acquisition-game/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Enterprise IT Acquisition Game</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/09/29/hp-product-line-decoder-ring/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2010. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/09/29/hp-product-line-decoder-ring/">Stephen&#8217;s HP Product Line Decoder Ring</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/computerhistory/" title="View all posts in Computer History" rel="category tag">Computer History</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/personal/" title="View all posts in Personal" rel="category tag">Personal</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/09/29/hp-product-line-decoder-ring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Will Capture the 10 Gigabit Ethernet Crown?</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/19/next-generation-10-gigabit-ethernet/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/19/next-generation-10-gigabit-ethernet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gestalt IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 gigabit Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brocade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCoE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Force10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foundry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProCurve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage area network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woven]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Brocade announced that it has completed its acquisition of Foundry Networks.  This is just the latest move in the strategic game to control the next generation of Ethernet, and possibly all local connectivity, including storage. Although 1 Gb Ethernet, 4 and 8 Gb Fibre Channel, and InfiniBand are all still going strong, the attention of the industry, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1276" title="Lego Chess Board" src="http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/img_0413.png" alt="Lego Chess Board" width="490" height="197" /></p>
<p>Today, <a href="http://brocade.com"  target="_blank">Brocade</a> <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=90440&amp;p=irol-newsArticle_print&amp;ID=1238061&amp;highlight="  target="_blank">announced</a> that it has completed its acquisition of <a href="http://www.foundrynet.com/" title="Foundry Networks"  target="_blank">Foundry Networks</a>.  This is just the latest move in the strategic game to control the next generation of Ethernet, and possibly all local connectivity, including storage. Although 1 Gb Ethernet, 4 and 8 Gb Fibre Channel, and InfiniBand are all still going strong, the attention of the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://chucksblog.typepad.com/chucks_blog/2008/10/fcoe-gets-taken.html"  target="_blank">industry</a>, the <a href="http://storageio.com/blog/?p=59"  target="_blank">pundits</a>, and the <a href="http://thefutureofstorage.com/archives/119"  target="_blank">prognosticators</a> (myself included) is firmly fixed on enhanced 10 Gb Ethernet. So Brocade&#8217;s move seems especially relevant to the core question of <strong>which companies will thrive and which will fail</strong> in a 10 Gb world.</p>
<p><a href="http://cisco.com/" title="Cisc"  target="_blank">Cisco</a> is, as always, the big player everyone is gunning for. They created a subsidiary, <a href="http://www.nuovasystems.com/index2.html"  target="_blank">Nuova</a>, to develop a next-generation architecture, then <a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2008/prod_040808b.html"  target="_blank">absorbed the company</a> in April. The result of Nuova&#8217;s work is Cisco&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9441/Products_Sub_Category_Home.html"  target="_blank">Nexus</a> line of data center switching products as well as much contribution to enhancements to Ethernet, known as Data Center Bridging (DCB) to the IEEE, Data Center Ethernet (DCE) <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/comments/dce_cee_and_dcb_what_is_the_difference/#When:18:29:00Z"  target="_blank">to Cisco</a>, and Converged Enhanced Ethernet (CEE) to others. The whole Nuova episode worked out quite well for Cisco, and they are <a href="http://storageio.com/blog/?p=147"  target="_blank">well-positioned</a> in the next-generation Ethernet game.</p>
<p>Although the fight to control the next generation of datacenter I/O can sometimes seem like a two-way battle between Cisco and Brocade, there are many players involved:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.wovensystems.com/" title="Woven Systems"  target="_blank">Woven Systems</a> <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/10/23/2008/10/13/woven-systems-launches-second-generation-of-enterprise-switches/" title="launched its second generation product"  target="_blank">launched its second-generation product</a> in October. Aimed squarely at the largest data centers, the Woven line sells at bargain prices and <a href="http://www.wovensystems.com/solutions/"  target="_blank">expands incrementally</a>, maintaining performance, according to the company.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.force10networks.com/" title="Force10"  target="_blank">Force10</a> has also found success selling a complete line of 10 Gb Ethernet products, from the core data center to the edge.<a href="http://www.foundrynet.com/" title="Foundry Networks"  target="_blank"></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.procurve.com/choice/index.htm"  target="_blank">HP&#8217;s ProCurve line</a> is mostly focused on smaller businesses, but the number-two supplier of networking hardware shouldn&#8217;t be discounted in this horse race!</li>
<li><a href="http://www.aristanetworks.com/en/Index"  target="_blank">Arista Networks</a> is another dark horse. With ex-Cisco &#8220;<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18548"  target="_blank">Data Center 3.0 commander</a>&#8221; Jayshree Ullal and <a href="http://valleywag.com/5067856/andy-bechtolsheim-quits-sun-again"  target="_blank">ex-Sun</a> Andy Bechtolsheim, Arista has so far played its 10 Gb song to a cloud computing refrain. But the company reportedly has strong technology, and could be a contender in the converged I/O space as well.</li>
</ul>
<p>This playing field is wide open. I expect Brocade and Cisco to be major players over the next few years, and that HP will acquire one of the other players at some point to add to their ProCurve line. But no matter who wins, the dominance of 10 Gb Ethernet is a safe bet.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/07/25/is-storage-really-that-different/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Is Storage Really That Different?</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/08/26/enterprise-acquisition-game/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Enterprise IT Acquisition Game</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Is the FCoE Starting Pistol Aimed at iSCSI?</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2011/10/21/fcoe-ready-prime-time/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Multi-Hop FCoE Is Not Ready For Prime Time (Yet)</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/04/01/who-am-i-fooling/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Cisco&#8217;s Wireless Data Center Pours On The Power</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/19/next-generation-10-gigabit-ethernet/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© sfoskett for <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net">Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</a>, 2008. |
<a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/19/next-generation-10-gigabit-ethernet/">Who Will Capture the 10 Gigabit Ethernet Crown?</a>
<br/>
This post was categorized as <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/enterprisestorage/" title="View all posts in Enterprise storage" rel="category tag">Enterprise storage</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/gestaltit/" title="View all posts in Gestalt IT" rel="category tag">Gestalt IT</a>, <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/category/everything/virtualstorage/" title="View all posts in Virtual Storage" rel="category tag">Virtual Storage</a>. Each of my categories has its own feed if you'd like to filter out or focus on posts like this.<br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/19/next-generation-10-gigabit-ethernet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

