• Home
  • About
    • Stephen Foskett
      • My Publications
        • Urban Forms in Suburbia: The Rise of the Edge City
      • Storage Magazine Columns
      • Whitepapers
      • Multimedia
      • Speaking Engagements
    • Services
    • Disclosures
  • Categories
    • Apple
    • Ask a Pack Rat
    • Computer History
    • Deals
    • Enterprise storage
    • Events
    • Personal
    • Photography
    • Terabyte home
    • Virtual Storage
  • Guides
    • The iPhone Exchange ActiveSync Guide
      • The iPhone Exchange ActiveSync Troubleshooting Guide
    • The iPad Exchange ActiveSync Guide
      • iPad Exchange ActiveSync Troubleshooting Guide
    • Toolbox
      • Power Over Ethernet Calculator
      • EMC Symmetrix WWN Calculator
      • EMC Symmetrix TimeFinder DOS Batch File
    • Linux Logical Volume Manager Walkthrough
  • Calendar

Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat

Understanding the accumulation of data

You are here: Home / Everything / Computer History / What’s In A Name? And Which Product Is Better?

What’s In A Name? And Which Product Is Better?

January 25, 2013 By Stephen 2 Comments

Every day, I’m briefed by another company with a range of products from entry-level to high-end. And every day I try to figure out their naming scheme: It seems most IT vendors follow the naming schemes of car companies, but few use the same naming system!

As Micron explained the logic behind their three SSD lines (e, m, and h for entry-level, midrange, and high-performance, respectively) I was struck by the contrast with a similar conversation I had with Nimbus Data over their lines (S-Class for speed, E-Class for enterprise, and now Gemini dual-controller). Just like so many other product areas, vendors are trying to convey important product differentiation information with their naming systems, but it’s often conflicting and confusing.

Mercedes, BMW, Cadillac, and Honda

Walk into a car dealership today and you’ll find dozens of different models from most manufacturers. Are the BMW 330i, the Mercedes-Benz C300, and the Cadillac CTS competitive? You bet! But each manufacturer uses a different naming scheme:

  • BMW’s car lines are numbered, with smaller initial numbers corresponding to smaller cars. Today, the company mainly uses odd-numbered series for sedans and even numbers for coupes. Thus, the 1 Series is a compact, the 3 Series is slightly larger, the 5 Series is full-sized, and the 7 Series is the limousine of the bunch. There’s also the forthcoming 2 and 4 Series as well as the established 6 and 8 Series coupes. The rest of the number roughly corresponds to engine size and performance, with letters denoting important options.
  • Mercedes-Benz uses letters to denote model lines, and these generally match the European auto size classifications. The A-Class is smallest, followed by the B-, C-, E-, and limousine S-Class. Again, Mercedes uses numbers to denote engine size and output as well as letters for important options. Thus, the 330i and C300 are indeed fierce competitors in the hot C-size automotive segment.
  • Cadillac now uses obscure initials for model names. Although the CTS  competes with the Mercedes C-Class, it’s larger and the rest of the line is merely alphabetical. The new ATS is smaller (though not A-size) and the XTS is large like the S-Class or 7 Series. This alphabet soup can be difficult for buyers to comprehend, but this hasn’t stopped Acura (ISX, TSX, RLX, etc), Infiniti (G, M, Q), and Lincoln (MKZ, MKX, etc) from following suit.
  • Then there are makers like Honda which use model names to keep their lines separate. Consumers have had decades to learn that an Accord is larger than a Civic and are now buying small Fits and Odyssey vans. Toyota (Yaris, Corolla, Camry, Avalon), Ford (Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Taurus), and many others also use names.

Pretty much every vehicle manufacturer uses one of these four systems (numbers, letters, initials, or names) to denote their various model lines, and many switch between systems over the years: Cadillac’s Catera was replaced by the CTS and their Seville became the STS, and Acura replaced the Integra with the ISX and the Legend with the RLX, for example. Generally, alphabet soup is perceived as “upscale” while names are considered “mass-market”.

Considering IT Equipment Naming

IT vendors have long followed these traditions, focusing primarily on the BMW number series scheme. Many vendors sell 3- 5- and 7-series devices, often using hundreds or thousands as specific model names. Customers can grok that a 3550 is smaller or slower than a 5760 without knowing what the rest of the name means!

  • Products with BMW-esque numbered lines include the old Palm (the Palm III, V, and 7), Intel’s current SSDs (335, 520, 710, and 910) and processors (the Core i3, i5, and i7), IBM midrange storage (DCS3700, DS5000, V7000), and many more besides. Others diverge from the strict 3/5/7 naming into similar numbering systems: NetApp has FAS2000, FAS3000, and FAS6000 lines, Cisco’s Nexus 1000v and 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 7000 series, and Nimble Storage has CS200 and CS400 lines.
  • Other products are inspired by Mercedes-Benz’s letter naming scheme. I mentioned Micron and Nimbus Data above, with their conflicting “e” series, and there are many others besides.
  • Quite a few product lines are given alphabet soup names, and like Cadillac these often have implicit or evolutionary meanings. Consider the Brocade VDX and MLX, reminiscent of Acura, for example. Then there are the Cisco ASR, Juniper QFX, and so on: These are evolved initialisms like Cadillac’s CTS.
  • Finally there are the companies like Dell that prefer product line names. Dell’s PowerVault is complemented by their acquired EqualLogic and Compellent systems in storage, but this might be just as confusing to customers as their Inspiron and Latitude laptop lines since there is no implicit meaning to the names. EMC originally had the Symmetrix and Clariion, but now prefers to use the similar-sounding Lincon-esque “VMAX” and “VNX” for these lines. I like Western Digital’s evocative “Blue”, “Green”, and “Black” hard disk drive lines better than Seagate’s plethora of names since they mean something.

Stephen’s Stance

Of course there are many, many other examples of number- and letter-series naming, and too many made-up alphabet soup and product line names that I haven’t included here. The point is, there is some logic to IT product naming, just like there is in cars and other products. But it’s not always obvious to consumers what they are buying!

What are your favorite examples of product line naming?

You might also want to read these other posts...

  • Your Mileage May Vary: Lies, Damn Lies, and Benchmarks
  • Total Nightmare: USB-C and Thunderbolt 3
  • Dell, Wall Street, Magic Beans, and the End of EMC
  • Waves of Storage Innovation
  • Add a Mirror to an Existing ZFS Drive

Filed Under: Computer History, Enterprise storage, Terabyte home, Virtual Storage Tagged With: BMW, Brocade, Cadillac, Cisco, CLARiiON, EMC, Honda, HP, IBM, Intel, Juniper, Mercedes-Benz, Micron, naming, NetApp, Nimble Storage, Nimbus Data, Palm, Seagate, Symmetrix, Western Digital

Technology is the name we give to things that don’t work yet

Danny Hillis

Subscribe via Email

Subscribe via email and you will receive my latest blog posts in your inbox. No ads or spam, just the same great content you find on my site!
 New posts (daily)
 Where's Stephen? (weekly)

Download My Book


Download my free e-book:
Essential Enterprise Storage Concepts!

Recent Posts

Add a Mirror to an Existing ZFS Drive

December 11, 2017

How To Remove Raw Images From Apple Photos and iCloud

How To Remove Raw Images From Apple Photos and iCloud

July 24, 2017

Recalling An HP MediaSmart Server To Active Duty

Recalling An HP MediaSmart Server To Active Duty

July 21, 2017

Go Get a ProtonMail Account and Protect Your Online Life!

Go Get a ProtonMail Account and Protect Your Online Life!

July 19, 2017

ZFS Is the Best Filesystem (For Now…)

ZFS Is the Best Filesystem (For Now…)

July 10, 2017

Co-Processors, GPGPU, and Heterogeneous Computing

Co-Processors, GPGPU, and Heterogeneous Computing

June 26, 2017

What is OCuLink?

What is OCuLink?

June 22, 2017

Storage is Getting Cloudier!

Storage is Getting Cloudier!

June 21, 2017

Where Have All The GPU’s Gone? Cryptocurrency Mining!

Where Have All The GPU’s Gone? Cryptocurrency Mining!

June 11, 2017

Turn Off Error Recovery in RAID Drives: TLER, ERC, and CCTL

Turn Off Error Recovery in RAID Drives: TLER, ERC, and CCTL

May 30, 2017

Symbolic Links

  • Describing Network Automation: Automate the Coffee

  • Cisco’s Latest AP is Mind-Blowing (and a quick history lesson)

  • E8 Storage Announces InfiniBand Support

  • Wireless Controller Extinction?

  • Using GnuCash as a Freelancer to Track Finances and Prepare Taxes

Featured Posts

My Visit to Bletchley Park

August 3, 2012

Why I Am Biased Against FCoE

October 21, 2011

Sony QX100 Lens Camera: Ruined by a Flaky iOS App

October 7, 2013

Datacenter History: Through the Ages in Lego

October 22, 2013

We Live in the Future: Robotic Cat Litter Boxes!

May 8, 2010

Instapaper for iPad and iPhone Enhances My Web World

June 1, 2010

On the Death of Innovation, or “These Kids These Days!”

May 21, 2012

Cisco’s Trojan Horse

September 15, 2014

It’s Time To Speak Out Against Sexism In IT Recruiting

May 6, 2013

vSphere 6: NFS 4.1 Finally Has a Use?

February 3, 2015

Copyright © 2018 · Log in