<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Will Capture the 10 Gigabit Ethernet Crown?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/19/next-generation-10-gigabit-ethernet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/19/next-generation-10-gigabit-ethernet/</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/19/next-generation-10-gigabit-ethernet/comment-page-1/#comment-13123</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=970#comment-13123</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that people are all on about 10Gig Ethernet or 8Gig Fibrechannel when most people don&#039;t use the 2Gig they already have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;True story - an engagement I was on a few months ago had the customer upgrading from an older environment, so, as such, we ran a baseline health-check on their san and found that even during peak utilization they were running at no more than 30% on each switch.  This means that of the 2Gigabit they had available they were using, on average, six-tenths of a gig.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course they *HAD* to go 4Gig, which goes to show you that marketing trumps engineering any day of the week and twice on Sunday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4Gig, 8Gig, 10Gig, it doesn&#039;t matter.  What matters is utilization, distance/latency, and ASIC layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I find it interesting that people are all on about 10Gig Ethernet or 8Gig Fibrechannel when most people don&#39;t use the 2Gig they already have.</p>
<p>True story &#8211; an engagement I was on a few months ago had the customer upgrading from an older environment, so, as such, we ran a baseline health-check on their san and found that even during peak utilization they were running at no more than 30% on each switch.  This means that of the 2Gigabit they had available they were using, on average, six-tenths of a gig.</p>
<p>Of course they *HAD* to go 4Gig, which goes to show you that marketing trumps engineering any day of the week and twice on Sunday.</p>
<p>4Gig, 8Gig, 10Gig, it doesn&#39;t matter.  What matters is utilization, distance/latency, and ASIC layout.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/19/next-generation-10-gigabit-ethernet/comment-page-1/#comment-12875</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=970#comment-12875</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that people are all on about 10Gig Ethernet or 8Gig Fibrechannel when most people don&#039;t use the 2Gig they already have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;True story - an engagement I was on a few months ago had the customer upgrading from an older environment, so, as such, we ran a baseline health-check on their san and found that even during peak utilization they were running at no more than 30% on each switch.  This means that of the 2Gigabit they had available they were using, on average, six-tenths of a gig.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course they *HAD* to go 4Gig, which goes to show you that marketing trumps engineering any day of the week and twice on Sunday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4Gig, 8Gig, 10Gig, it doesn&#039;t matter.  What matters is utilization, distance/latency, and ASIC layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I find it interesting that people are all on about 10Gig Ethernet or 8Gig Fibrechannel when most people don&#39;t use the 2Gig they already have.</p>
<p>True story &#8211; an engagement I was on a few months ago had the customer upgrading from an older environment, so, as such, we ran a baseline health-check on their san and found that even during peak utilization they were running at no more than 30% on each switch.  This means that of the 2Gigabit they had available they were using, on average, six-tenths of a gig.</p>
<p>Of course they *HAD* to go 4Gig, which goes to show you that marketing trumps engineering any day of the week and twice on Sunday.</p>
<p>4Gig, 8Gig, 10Gig, it doesn&#39;t matter.  What matters is utilization, distance/latency, and ASIC layout.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3parfarley</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/19/next-generation-10-gigabit-ethernet/comment-page-1/#comment-12434</link>
		<dc:creator>3parfarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=970#comment-12434</guid>
		<description>It looks like Brocade and Foundry have been been working very hard, preparing for this.  There might be a tiger in the tank at Brocade after all.  I like the way they seem ready to take the bull by the horns.  In the months to come we&#039;ll see how much conviction they have to follow up on this acquisition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It looks like Brocade and Foundry have been been working very hard, preparing for this.  There might be a tiger in the tank at Brocade after all.  I like the way they seem ready to take the bull by the horns.  In the months to come we&#39;ll see how much conviction they have to follow up on this acquisition.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
