<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Will Virtualization of Data Center Infrastructure Take Us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/14/virtualization-data-center-infrastructure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/14/virtualization-data-center-infrastructure/</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Hu Yooshida</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/14/virtualization-data-center-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-14084</link>
		<dc:creator>Hu Yooshida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=1154#comment-14084</guid>
		<description>Great post on the limitations of Virtualization 1.0. This phase of virtualization was focused on consolidation and increased utilization and was not transformational as you point out. I believe that virtualization has moved forward to the next phase which is truely transformational.  VMware is moving to that next phase in server virtualization and Hitachi is there in storage virtualization. I expand on this in my recent blog post &lt;br&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_storage_virtualization_take_us.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_stor...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Great post on the limitations of Virtualization 1.0. This phase of virtualization was focused on consolidation and increased utilization and was not transformational as you point out. I believe that virtualization has moved forward to the next phase which is truely transformational.  VMware is moving to that next phase in server virtualization and Hitachi is there in storage virtualization. I expand on this in my recent blog post <br /> <a href="http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_storage_virtualization_take_us.html"  rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_stor.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_stor..</a>.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hu Yooshida</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/14/virtualization-data-center-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-13213</link>
		<dc:creator>Hu Yooshida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=1154#comment-13213</guid>
		<description>Great post on the limitations of Virtualization 1.0. This phase of virtualization was focused on consolidation and increased utilization and was not transformational as you point out. I believe that virtualization has moved forward to the next phase which is truely transformational.  VMware is moving to that next phase in server virtualization and Hitachi is there in storage virtualization. I expand on this in my recent blog post &lt;br&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_storage_virtualization_take_us.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_stor...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Great post on the limitations of Virtualization 1.0. This phase of virtualization was focused on consolidation and increased utilization and was not transformational as you point out. I believe that virtualization has moved forward to the next phase which is truely transformational.  VMware is moving to that next phase in server virtualization and Hitachi is there in storage virtualization. I expand on this in my recent blog post <br /> <a href="http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_storage_virtualization_take_us.html"  rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_stor.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_stor..</a>.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hu Yooshida</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/14/virtualization-data-center-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-13020</link>
		<dc:creator>Hu Yooshida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=1154#comment-13020</guid>
		<description>Great post on the limitations of Virtualization 1.0. This phase of virtualization was focused on consolidation and increased utilization and was not transformational as you point out. I believe that virtualization has moved forward to the next phase which is truely transformational.  VMware is moving to that next phase in server virtualization and Hitachi is there in storage virtualization. I expand on this in my recent blog post &lt;br&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_storage_virtualization_take_us.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_stor...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Great post on the limitations of Virtualization 1.0. This phase of virtualization was focused on consolidation and increased utilization and was not transformational as you point out. I believe that virtualization has moved forward to the next phase which is truely transformational.  VMware is moving to that next phase in server virtualization and Hitachi is there in storage virtualization. I expand on this in my recent blog post <br /> <a href="http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_storage_virtualization_take_us.html"  rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_stor.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.hds.com/hu/2009/01/where_will_stor..</a>.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfoskett</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/14/virtualization-data-center-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-12292</link>
		<dc:creator>sfoskett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=1154#comment-12292</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the detailed comment, Chad! And for your excellent blog (if you don&#039;t already read Chad&#039;s Virtual Geek, you should! &lt;a href=&quot;http://virtualgeek.typepad.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://virtualgeek.typepad.com&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m concerned that people think the value of virtualization begins and ends with infrastructure savings (&quot;condensation&quot;) and thus are missing out on the real value - transforming the open systems data center!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Thanks for the detailed comment, Chad! And for your excellent blog (if you don&#39;t already read Chad&#39;s Virtual Geek, you should! <a href="http://virtualgeek.typepad.com"  rel="nofollow">http://virtualgeek.typepad.com</a>)</p>
<p>I&#39;m concerned that people think the value of virtualization begins and ends with infrastructure savings (&#8220;condensation&#8221;) and thus are missing out on the real value &#8211; transforming the open systems data center!</p>
<p>Stephen<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Sakac</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/14/virtualization-data-center-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-12291</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Sakac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=1154#comment-12291</guid>
		<description>Steve, now you&#039;re thinking about this the way I do (and many of my EMC compatriots do).   The CapEx savings of virtualization, consolidation and efficiency (in all it&#039;s tier/archive/dedupe/power) forms is important, but you&#039;re right - it IS the sideshow.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is, however the core prerequisite for the next step in datacenter transformation - you get the macro benefit in the &quot;majority virtualized&quot; state, otherwise processes and management models are dominated by the non-virtualized use cases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With our key strategic partneres, we&#039;re trying to work on this problem at every layer.  It is a BIG problem, but the transformative possibility (in my opinion at least) is huge.   It&#039;s going to take us a while, and not every piece of the puzzle is solved - but every step on the journey can have a customer pay-off.    Look at our actions, innovations, acquisitions, launches and partnerships through this lens, and you&#039;ve got it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we do our job right - it would give more opportunity for IT to focus on the things that provide core value to the business - but without the forced secondary effects outsourcing did (and wihch made it untenable for many)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Steve, now you&#39;re thinking about this the way I do (and many of my EMC compatriots do).   The CapEx savings of virtualization, consolidation and efficiency (in all it&#39;s tier/archive/dedupe/power) forms is important, but you&#39;re right &#8211; it IS the sideshow.   </p>
<p>It is, however the core prerequisite for the next step in datacenter transformation &#8211; you get the macro benefit in the &#8220;majority virtualized&#8221; state, otherwise processes and management models are dominated by the non-virtualized use cases.</p>
<p>With our key strategic partneres, we&#39;re trying to work on this problem at every layer.  It is a BIG problem, but the transformative possibility (in my opinion at least) is huge.   It&#39;s going to take us a while, and not every piece of the puzzle is solved &#8211; but every step on the journey can have a customer pay-off.    Look at our actions, innovations, acquisitions, launches and partnerships through this lens, and you&#39;ve got it.</p>
<p>If we do our job right &#8211; it would give more opportunity for IT to focus on the things that provide core value to the business &#8211; but without the forced secondary effects outsourcing did (and wihch made it untenable for many)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/12/14/virtualization-data-center-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-12189</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=1154#comment-12189</guid>
		<description>[...] Stephen Foskett, aka the Storage &#8220;Pack Rat&#8221; has a new posting on his blog about virtualization titled Where Will Virtualization of Data Center Infrastructure Take Us?. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] Stephen Foskett, aka the Storage &#8220;Pack Rat&#8221; has a new posting on his blog about virtualization titled Where Will Virtualization of Data Center Infrastructure Take Us?. [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
