<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Symantec&#8217;s Thin API: The Plot Thickens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/24/symantec-thin-api/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/24/symantec-thin-api/</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/24/symantec-thin-api/comment-page-1/#comment-11658</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=933#comment-11658</guid>
		<description>Yes, it can be effective. And this is especially true with this new API and advanced capabilities that are being added to the storage devices. But thin provisioning will always be a &quot;lie&quot; - it promises capacity that cannot necessarily be delivered. The next wave of improvements will be managing that lie...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Yes, it can be effective. And this is especially true with this new API and advanced capabilities that are being added to the storage devices. But thin provisioning will always be a &#8220;lie&#8221; &#8211; it promises capacity that cannot necessarily be delivered. The next wave of improvements will be managing that lie&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc.farley@3par.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/24/symantec-thin-api/comment-page-1/#comment-11651</link>
		<dc:creator>marc.farley@3par.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=933#comment-11651</guid>
		<description>Excellent post Stephen!  BUT I think saying thin provisioning is a &quot;lie&quot;, could be easily misunderstood. There is no question that you should NOT USE THIN PROVISIONING FOR END USER STORAGE, but that doesn&#039;t mean that it can&#039;t be amazingly effective and not at all dangerous for many other uses.  For example, VMFS, is extremely thin friendly and becoming more so all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Excellent post Stephen!  BUT I think saying thin provisioning is a &#8220;lie&#8221;, could be easily misunderstood. There is no question that you should NOT USE THIN PROVISIONING FOR END USER STORAGE, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that it can&#8217;t be amazingly effective and not at all dangerous for many other uses.  For example, VMFS, is extremely thin friendly and becoming more so all the time.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symantec&#8217;s Thin API Is A Step In The Right Direction - Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/24/symantec-thin-api/comment-page-1/#comment-11637</link>
		<dc:creator>Symantec&#8217;s Thin API Is A Step In The Right Direction - Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=933#comment-11637</guid>
		<description>[...] More details have come out about Symantec&#8217;s new capability. Reed my follow-up post on Symantec&#8217;s Thin API for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] More details have come out about Symantec&#8217;s new capability. Reed my follow-up post on Symantec&#8217;s Thin API for [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
