<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the FCoE Starting Pistol Aimed at iSCSI?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-14273</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=900#comment-14273</guid>
		<description>iSCSI is targeting on small business while FCoE and Fibre Cnannel targeting on Enterprise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can see FcoE and iSCSI implementation examples at &lt;a href=&quot;http://fcoe.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://fcoe.ru&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->iSCSI is targeting on small business while FCoE and Fibre Cnannel targeting on Enterprise.</p>
<p>You can see FcoE and iSCSI implementation examples at <a href="http://fcoe.ru"  rel="nofollow">http://fcoe.ru</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles Chekroun</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-14048</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles Chekroun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=900#comment-14048</guid>
		<description>One main difference between iSCSI and FCoE is the fact that FCoE still relies on FCP and so is seamless to FC networks. SAN administrators really like it because nothing is changed in the management tools for SAN zoning, multipathing etc...&lt;br&gt;FCoE is still FC while iSCSI is NOT.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;makes a big difference and in my opinion on of the main reason iSCSI has such a small market compared to FC&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gilles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->One main difference between iSCSI and FCoE is the fact that FCoE still relies on FCP and so is seamless to FC networks. SAN administrators really like it because nothing is changed in the management tools for SAN zoning, multipathing etc&#8230;<br />FCoE is still FC while iSCSI is NOT.</p>
<p>makes a big difference and in my opinion on of the main reason iSCSI has such a small market compared to FC</p>
<p>Gilles<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles Chekroun</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-13343</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles Chekroun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=900#comment-13343</guid>
		<description>One main difference between iSCSI and FCoE is the fact that FCoE still relies on FCP and so is seamless to FC networks. SAN administrators really like it because nothing is changed in the management tools for SAN zoning, multipathing etc...&lt;br&gt;FCoE is still FC while iSCSI is NOT.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;makes a big difference and in my opinion on of the main reason iSCSI has such a small market compared to FC&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gilles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->One main difference between iSCSI and FCoE is the fact that FCoE still relies on FCP and so is seamless to FC networks. SAN administrators really like it because nothing is changed in the management tools for SAN zoning, multipathing etc&#8230;<br />FCoE is still FC while iSCSI is NOT.</p>
<p>makes a big difference and in my opinion on of the main reason iSCSI has such a small market compared to FC</p>
<p>Gilles<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Continuing the FCoE Discussion &#124; Storage Blogs - Storage Monkeys Blogs</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-12110</link>
		<dc:creator>Continuing the FCoE Discussion &#124; Storage Blogs - Storage Monkeys Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=900#comment-12110</guid>
		<description>[...] FCoE a viable option for SMB/Commercial?  Is the FCoE Starting Pistol Aimed at iSCSI? Reality Check: The FCoE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] FCoE a viable option for SMB/Commercial?  Is the FCoE Starting Pistol Aimed at iSCSI? Reality Check: The FCoE [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Continuing the FCoE Discussion - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-12109</link>
		<dc:creator>Continuing the FCoE Discussion - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=900#comment-12109</guid>
		<description>[...] FCoE a viable option for SMB/Commercial?  Is the FCoE Starting Pistol Aimed at iSCSI? Reality Check: The FCoE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] FCoE a viable option for SMB/Commercial?  Is the FCoE Starting Pistol Aimed at iSCSI? Reality Check: The FCoE [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storage Folks Are Talking 10-Gig and FCoE - Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-11923</link>
		<dc:creator>Storage Folks Are Talking 10-Gig and FCoE - Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=900#comment-11923</guid>
		<description>[...] and &#8220;(future) FCoE shops&#8221; with very little overlap (as I previously noted, iSCSI and FCoE aren&#8217;t mortal enemies, and FCoE will rule in the largest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] and &#8220;(future) FCoE shops&#8221; with very little overlap (as I previously noted, iSCSI and FCoE aren&#8217;t mortal enemies, and FCoE will rule in the largest [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Check: The FCoE Forecast - Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-11394</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Check: The FCoE Forecast - Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=900#comment-11394</guid>
		<description>[...] it does succeed, another critical question is what this means for iSCSI, Fibre Channel, InfiniBand, and to a lesser extent AoE, expanded SAS, and other options for SAN [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] it does succeed, another critical question is what this means for iSCSI, Fibre Channel, InfiniBand, and to a lesser extent AoE, expanded SAS, and other options for SAN [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-11277</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=900#comment-11277</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just as nuts! The first thing I did when I got one of the prototype LeftHand arrays way back when was to plug it into a Linksys router and mount a LUN over Wi-Fi!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m just as nuts! The first thing I did when I got one of the prototype LeftHand arrays way back when was to plug it into a Linksys router and mount a LUN over Wi-Fi!  <img src='http://blog.fosketts.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> <!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://technorati.com/people/technorati/storagebod</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-11274</link>
		<dc:creator>http://technorati.com/people/technorati/storagebod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=900#comment-11274</guid>
		<description>And I forgot, http://www.open-fcoe.org if you want to play with a software initiator. I&#039;ve not done so myself but I might have a go (told you, I&#039;m nuts).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->And I forgot, <a href="http://www.open-fcoe.org"  rel="nofollow">http://www.open-fcoe.org</a> if you want to play with a software initiator. I&#8217;ve not done so myself but I might have a go (told you, I&#8217;m nuts).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://technorati.com/people/technorati/storagebod</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-11273</link>
		<dc:creator>http://technorati.com/people/technorati/storagebod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/?p=900#comment-11273</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t actually forget that iSCSI can run a 10GbE speeds; obviously it can run at the speed of the underlying network. I&#039;ve run iSCSI over wireless before (I&#039;m nuts)!

I think iSCSI will survive quite happily in it&#039;s market sector; I think FCoE will probably end up dominating in the Enterprise Data Centre as the protocol of choice for block but I&#039;m not expecting it to be huge in the SMB market.

I think FCoE will happen fairly quickly in the DC tho&#039;; especially in the form of top of rack solutions. But iSCSI fatally wounded, not a chance at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I didn&#8217;t actually forget that iSCSI can run a 10GbE speeds; obviously it can run at the speed of the underlying network. I&#8217;ve run iSCSI over wireless before (I&#8217;m nuts)!</p>
<p>I think iSCSI will survive quite happily in it&#8217;s market sector; I think FCoE will probably end up dominating in the Enterprise Data Centre as the protocol of choice for block but I&#8217;m not expecting it to be huge in the SMB market.</p>
<p>I think FCoE will happen fairly quickly in the DC tho&#8217;; especially in the form of top of rack solutions. But iSCSI fatally wounded, not a chance at the moment.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
