<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storage History: The 3Server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:58:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: DeepStorage</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/comment-page-1/#comment-14716</link>
		<dc:creator>DeepStorage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/#comment-14716</guid>
		<description>Actually the 3Server with 3+Share wasn&#039;t a file server but what we would now call a SAN array.  Workstations sent head, disk, sector (SCSI was new then so LBA not a standard) requests.  Volumes were R/W for a single user or R/O for all.  Shared R/W required applications to support APIs for access.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s why Novell killed them. File services much better idea for user workstations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3+Open used SMB and was a file server.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SMB first appeared in IBM LAN Program/DOS 3.1 and MS OEMed it as MS-Net.  DOS was just too limited as a server OS so they partnered with 3Com to add networking to OS/2 in LAN Manager.  3Com got hosed on the deal by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the 3Server with 3+Share wasn&#39;t a file server but what we would now call a SAN array.  Workstations sent head, disk, sector (SCSI was new then so LBA not a standard) requests.  Volumes were R/W for a single user or R/O for all.  Shared R/W required applications to support APIs for access.</p>
<p>That&#39;s why Novell killed them. File services much better idea for user workstations.</p>
<p>3+Open used SMB and was a file server.</p>
<p>SMB first appeared in IBM LAN Program/DOS 3.1 and MS OEMed it as MS-Net.  DOS was just too limited as a server OS so they partnered with 3Com to add networking to OS/2 in LAN Manager.  3Com got hosed on the deal by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>How could I, a Mass-hole myself, forget to mention Banyan?  It was the first NOS I was exposed to when I was an undergrad at WPI!  Thanks for pointing this out!  I meant to be focusing on the 3Server, but Banyan deserved at least a shout-out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could I, a Mass-hole myself, forget to mention Banyan?  It was the first NOS I was exposed to when I was an undergrad at WPI!  Thanks for pointing this out!  I meant to be focusing on the 3Server, but Banyan deserved at least a shout-out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfoskett</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/comment-page-1/#comment-14880</link>
		<dc:creator>sfoskett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/#comment-14880</guid>
		<description>How could I, a Mass-hole myself, forget to mention Banyan?  It was the first NOS I was exposed to when I was an undergrad at WPI!  Thanks for pointing this out!  I meant to be focusing on the 3Server, but Banyan deserved at least a shout-out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could I, a Mass-hole myself, forget to mention Banyan?  It was the first NOS I was exposed to when I was an undergrad at WPI!  Thanks for pointing this out!  I meant to be focusing on the 3Server, but Banyan deserved at least a shout-out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsa</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>tsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Just for completeness, the third major player of that era was Banyan, with Banyan VINES. While I worked there, we moved VINES from a proprietary hardware platform to generic 386 servers and ultimately implemented it as services on top of SCO Unix. If you&#039;re going to cover this in a future segment, great. If not, readers can look up &quot;Banyan&quot; on wikipedia.org for a reasonably accurate summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for completeness, the third major player of that era was Banyan, with Banyan VINES. While I worked there, we moved VINES from a proprietary hardware platform to generic 386 servers and ultimately implemented it as services on top of SCO Unix. If you&#8217;re going to cover this in a future segment, great. If not, readers can look up &#8220;Banyan&#8221; on wikipedia.org for a reasonably accurate summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsa</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/comment-page-1/#comment-14879</link>
		<dc:creator>tsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/25/storage-history-the-3server/#comment-14879</guid>
		<description>Just for completeness, the third major player of that era was Banyan, with Banyan VINES. While I worked there, we moved VINES from a proprietary hardware platform to generic 386 servers and ultimately implemented it as services on top of SCO Unix. If you&#039;re going to cover this in a future segment, great. If not, readers can look up &quot;Banyan&quot; on wikipedia.org for a reasonably accurate summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for completeness, the third major player of that era was Banyan, with Banyan VINES. While I worked there, we moved VINES from a proprietary hardware platform to generic 386 servers and ultimately implemented it as services on top of SCO Unix. If you&#8217;re going to cover this in a future segment, great. If not, readers can look up &#8220;Banyan&#8221; on wikipedia.org for a reasonably accurate summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

