<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NetApp heads to the buffet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/21/netapp-heads-to-the-buffet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/21/netapp-heads-to-the-buffet/</link>
	<description>Understanding the accumulation of data</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat :: IBM Warms to the Compact Storage Market</title>
		<link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/21/netapp-heads-to-the-buffet/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat :: IBM Warms to the Compact Storage Market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/06/21/netapp-heads-to-the-buffet/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] used for a while) and turned on iSCSI functionality. IBM veers off course from the startups by not bundling snapshot and replication technology with their new array, however. This reduces the cost of entry but diminishes the impact of this new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] used for a while) and turned on iSCSI functionality. IBM veers off course from the startups by not bundling snapshot and replication technology with their new array, however. This reduces the cost of entry but diminishes the impact of this new [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
